AC
Price
$32.34
Change
+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Updated
Apr 9, 04:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
703.04M
VRTS
Price
$159.13
Change
+$12.26 (+8.35%)
Updated
Apr 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.71B
15 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AC vs VRTS

Header iconAC vs VRTS Comparison
Open Charts AC vs VRTSBanner chart's image
Associated Capital Group
Price$32.34
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Volume$400
Capitalization703.04M
Virtus Investment Partners
Price$159.13
Change+$12.26 (+8.35%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.71B
AC vs VRTS Comparison Chart
Loading...
AC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AC vs. VRTS commentary
Apr 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AC is a Hold and VRTS is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2025
Stock price -- (AC: $32.29 vs. VRTS: $146.87)
Brand notoriety: AC and VRTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AC: 27% vs. VRTS: 92%
Market capitalization -- AC: $703.04M vs. VRTS: $1.71B
AC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $703.04M. VRTS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AC and VRTS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRTS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • VRTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VRTS is a better buy in the short-term than AC.

Price Growth

AC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -15.45% price change this week, while VRTS (@Investment Managers) price change was -15.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -5.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

AC is expected to report earnings on May 10, 2023.

VRTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-5.45% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRTS($1.72B) has a higher market cap than AC($703M). AC has higher P/E ratio than VRTS: AC (18.85) vs VRTS (13.66). AC YTD gains are higher at: -5.749 vs. VRTS (-32.699). VRTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 434M vs. AC (47.7M). AC has more cash in the bank: 407M vs. VRTS (340M). VRTS has higher revenues than AC: VRTS (841M) vs AC (12.7M).
ACVRTSAC / VRTS
Capitalization703M1.72B41%
EBITDA47.7M434M11%
Gain YTD-5.749-32.69918%
P/E Ratio18.8513.66138%
Revenue12.7M841M2%
Total Cash407M340M120%
Total DebtN/A2.18B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AC vs VRTS: Fundamental Ratings
AC
VRTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
565
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10058
SMR RATING
1..100
8057
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5884
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5680
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VRTS's Valuation (15) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as AC (38). This means that VRTS’s stock grew similarly to AC’s over the last 12 months.

VRTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AC (100). This means that VRTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AC’s over the last 12 months.

VRTS's SMR Rating (57) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as AC (80). This means that VRTS’s stock grew similarly to AC’s over the last 12 months.

AC's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as VRTS (84). This means that AC’s stock grew similarly to VRTS’s over the last 12 months.

AC's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as VRTS (80). This means that AC’s stock grew similarly to VRTS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACVRTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TAREX21.00N/A
N/A
Third Avenue Real Estate Value Instl
IIRMX9.95N/A
N/A
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port I
GLNNX20.58N/A
N/A
MFS Global New Discovery R6
FGSCX21.08N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
JDBRX41.46N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Balanced R

AC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AC has been loosely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AC jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AC
1D Price
Change %
AC100%
+0.09%
SEIC - AC
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.06%
PFG - AC
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.92%
JHG - AC
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
BN - AC
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
ARES - AC
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
More

VRTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRTS has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VRTS jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRTS
1D Price
Change %
VRTS100%
-2.72%
APAM - VRTS
68%
Closely correlated
-2.42%
IVZ - VRTS
68%
Closely correlated
-4.48%
AMG - VRTS
67%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
TROW - VRTS
66%
Closely correlated
-1.70%
JHG - VRTS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
More