Ad is loading...
ACABU
Price
$8.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
BBOE
Price
$2.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

ACABU vs BBOE

Header iconACABU vs BBOE Comparison
Open Charts ACABU vs BBOEBanner chart's image
Atlantic Coastal Acquisition
Price$8.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.12K
CapitalizationN/A
Black Box Entertainment
Price$2.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$320
CapitalizationN/A
ACABU vs BBOE Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACABU vs. BBOE commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACABU is a Sell and BBOE is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (ACABU: $8.05 vs. BBOE: $2.06)
Brand notoriety: ACABU and BBOE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACABU: 88% vs. BBOE: 12%
Market capitalization -- ACABU: $0 vs. BBOE: $364.5K
ACABU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. BBOE’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $364.5K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACABU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBBOE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACABU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BBOE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBOE is a better buy in the long-term than ACABU.

Price Growth

ACABU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BBOE (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -18.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.64% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBOE YTD gains are higher at: 272.958 vs. ACABU (-23.552). ACABU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.14M vs. BBOE (-88.81K). ACABU has more cash in the bank: 265K vs. BBOE (79.9K). ACABU has less debt than BBOE: ACABU (160K) vs BBOE (1.69M). BBOE has higher revenues than ACABU: BBOE (3.69M) vs ACABU (0).
ACABUBBOEACABU / BBOE
CapitalizationN/A365K-
EBITDA4.14M-88.81K-4,663%
Gain YTD-23.552272.958-9%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue03.69M-
Total Cash265K79.9K332%
Total Debt160K1.69M9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBOE: Fundamental Ratings
BBOE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRMPX28.440.46
+1.64%
Nuveen Small Cap Growth Opp A
TWADX8.830.08
+0.91%
American Century Value A
PCLVX23.230.13
+0.56%
PACE Large Co Value Equity P
CGVIX15.450.07
+0.46%
Causeway Global Value Inst
VSPGX817.600.18
+0.02%
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Instl

ACABU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACABU has been loosely correlated with MARXU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACABU jumps, then MARXU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACABU
1D Price
Change %
ACABU100%
N/A
MARXU - ACABU
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MCAA - ACABU
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTAL - ACABU
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
CBRG - ACABU
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBOE - ACABU
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.75%
More

BBOE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBOE and NLSC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBOE and NLSC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBOE
1D Price
Change %
BBOE100%
+2.75%
NLSC - BBOE
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLAMF - BBOE
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACABU - BBOE
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INOQ - BBOE
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVCPU - BBOE
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More