Ad is loading...
ACCAX vs HBLSX
ACCAX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts ACCAX vs HBLSX
American Century Strat Allc: Cnsrv A
Price$5.42
Change+$0.02 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets276.2M
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.39
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.69B
ACCAX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACCAX vs. HBLSX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACCAX is a Hold and HBLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. ACCAX (276M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than ACCAX: HBLSX (3.26) vs ACCAX (2.16). ACCAX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: ACCAX (29 years) vs HBLSX (15 years). ACCAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. ACCAX (30.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACCAX: HBLSX (0) vs ACCAX (2500). HBLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.98 vs. ACCAX (2.00). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 16.77 vs. ACCAX (12.81).
| ACCAX | HBLSX | ACCAX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.96 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.96 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.538 | 1.624 | 33% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 276M | 11.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 3.26 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.00 | 3.98 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.02 | 7.53 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.81 | 16.77 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.49 | 31.35 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers