ACDSF
Price
$2.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
9.37B
SVC
Price
$2.35
Change
+$0.08 (+3.52%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACDSF vs SVC

Header iconACDSF vs SVC Comparison
Open Charts ACDSF vs SVCBanner chart's image
Ascendas Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$2.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.58K
Capitalization9.37B
Service Properties Trust
Price$2.35
Change+$0.08 (+3.52%)
Volume$724.1K
Capitalization1.12B
ACDSF vs SVC Comparison Chart
Loading...
SVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACDSF vs. SVC commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACDSF is a Hold and SVC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ACDSF: $2.01 vs. SVC: $2.35)
Brand notoriety: ACDSF and SVC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACDSF: 29% vs. SVC: 37%
Market capitalization -- ACDSF: $9.37B vs. SVC: $1.12B
ACDSF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $9.37B. SVC’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACDSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSVC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACDSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SVC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SVC is a better buy in the long-term than ACDSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SVC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SVC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ACDSF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -2.19% price change this week, while SVC (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +1.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

SVC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.50% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACDSF($9.37B) has a higher market cap than SVC($1.12B). SVC has higher P/E ratio than ACDSF: SVC (22.24) vs ACDSF (16.03). ACDSF YTD gains are higher at: 11.915 vs. SVC (-6.631). ACDSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.27B vs. SVC (665M). ACDSF has more cash in the bank: 286M vs. SVC (180M). SVC has less debt than ACDSF: SVC (5.52B) vs ACDSF (6.85B). SVC has higher revenues than ACDSF: SVC (1.87B) vs ACDSF (1.31B).
ACDSFSVCACDSF / SVC
Capitalization9.37B1.12B833%
EBITDA1.27B665M191%
Gain YTD11.915-6.631-180%
P/E Ratio16.0322.2472%
Revenue1.31B1.87B70%
Total Cash286M180M159%
Total Debt6.85B5.52B124%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACDSF vs SVC: Fundamental Ratings
ACDSF
SVC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
328
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9894
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9999
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SVC's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACDSF (79). This means that SVC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACDSF’s over the last 12 months.

SVC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ACDSF (100). This means that SVC’s stock grew similarly to ACDSF’s over the last 12 months.

SVC's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as ACDSF (98). This means that SVC’s stock grew similarly to ACDSF’s over the last 12 months.

ACDSF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SVC (63). This means that ACDSF’s stock grew similarly to SVC’s over the last 12 months.

ACDSF's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as SVC (99). This means that ACDSF’s stock grew similarly to SVC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SVC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOPAX23.790.33
+1.41%
NYLI WMC Small Companies Class A
CDVZX16.61N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Value Inst
CWSIX13.47N/A
N/A
Carillon Chartwell Small Cap Value I
UGTIX27.70N/A
N/A
Victory Growth and Tax Strategy Ins
TIBCX29.40-0.02
-0.07%
Thornburg Investment Income Builder C

ACDSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACDSF and DHC have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACDSF and DHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACDSF
1D Price
Change %
ACDSF100%
+0.07%
DHC - ACDSF
16%
Poorly correlated
+3.05%
NREF - ACDSF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
ALSRF - ACDSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVC - ACDSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
PINE - ACDSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
More

SVC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVC has been loosely correlated with XHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVC jumps, then XHR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVC
1D Price
Change %
SVC100%
+3.52%
XHR - SVC
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
RLJ - SVC
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.48%
APLE - SVC
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
PK - SVC
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.50%
INN - SVC
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
More