Ad is loading...
ACDXF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
VINS
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
Ad is loading...

ACDXF vs VINS

Header iconACDXF vs VINS Comparison
Open Charts ACDXF vs VINSBanner chart's image
American Copper Development
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$119.93K
CapitalizationN/A
Vindicator Silver Lead Mining
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.7K
CapitalizationN/A
ACDXF vs VINS Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACDXF vs. VINS commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACDXF is a Hold and VINS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ACDXF: $0.02 vs. VINS: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: ACDXF and VINS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACDXF: 382% vs. VINS: 158%
Market capitalization -- ACDXF: $14.03M vs. VINS: $0
ACDXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $14.03M. VINS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACDXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVINS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACDXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VINS is a better buy in the long-term than ACDXF.

Price Growth

ACDXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -17.50% price change this week, while VINS (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VINS YTD gains are higher at: -40.800 vs. ACDXF (-76.429).
ACDXFVINSACDXF / VINS
Capitalization14MN/A-
EBITDA-1.98MN/A-
Gain YTD-76.429-40.800187%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash6.13MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VINS: Fundamental Ratings
VINS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTO46.81-0.04
-0.09%
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
IYLD20.10-0.02
-0.11%
iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Inc ETF
EMMF26.81-0.04
-0.14%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Mltfctr
DYLG29.71-0.10
-0.32%
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & GrowthETF
QVAL45.50-0.65
-1.41%
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Val ETF

ACDXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACDXF and VINS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACDXF and VINS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACDXF
1D Price
Change %
ACDXF100%
N/A
VINS - ACDXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BELGF - ACDXF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QDROF - ACDXF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PUCCF - ACDXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRLGF - ACDXF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
More