Ad is loading...
ACEAX vs FHKCX
ACEAX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs FHKCX
AB All China Equity A
Price$8.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.3M
Fidelity China Region
Price$37.10
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
ACEAX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. FHKCX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. ACEAX (45.3M). ACEAX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: ACEAX (2.72) vs FHKCX (1.33). ACEAX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: ACEAX (7 years) vs FHKCX (29 years). ACEAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEAX: FHKCX (0) vs ACEAX (2500). FHKCX (13.23) and ACEAX (12.92) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.36 vs. ACEAX (-12.56).
| ACEAX | FHKCX | ACEAX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.91 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.91 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.873 | -4.603 | -19% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.3M | 1.18B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.72 | 1.33 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.92 | 13.23 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.31 | 8.91 | -127% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.56 | 2.36 | -533% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 6.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers