Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs FHKCX
ACEAX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs FHKCX
AB All China Equity A
Price$9.60
Change-$0.05 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.1M
Fidelity China Region
Price$47.23
Change-$0.03 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
ACEAX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. FHKCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a StrongBuy and FHKCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. ACEAX (51.1M). ACEAX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: ACEAX (2.64) vs FHKCX (1.22). ACEAX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: ACEAX (7 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). ACEAX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEAX: FHKCX (0) vs ACEAX (2500). ACEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.22 vs. FHKCX (33.87). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.21 vs. ACEAX (-9.73).
| ACEAX | FHKCX | ACEAX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.91 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.91 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.701 | 21.445 | 92% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.1M | 1.24B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 1.22 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.22 | 33.87 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.09 | 43.29 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.73 | 5.21 | -187% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement