ACEJF
Price
$19.18
Change
-$0.62 (-3.13%)
Updated
Dec 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.61B
CLPHF
Price
$8.72
Change
+$0.07 (+0.81%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
20.56B
Ad is loading...

ACEJF vs CLPHF

Header iconACEJF vs CLPHF Comparison
Open Charts ACEJF vs CLPHFBanner chart's image
Acea Spar
Price$19.18
Change-$0.62 (-3.13%)
Volume$26.8K
Capitalization2.61B
CLP Holdings
Price$8.72
Change+$0.07 (+0.81%)
Volume$4.31K
Capitalization20.56B
ACEJF vs CLPHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ACEJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACEJF vs. CLPHF commentary
Jan 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEJF is a Hold and CLPHF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2025
Stock price -- (ACEJF: $19.18 vs. CLPHF: $8.72)
Brand notoriety: ACEJF and CLPHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACEJF: 366% vs. CLPHF: 320%
Market capitalization -- ACEJF: $2.61B vs. CLPHF: $20.56B
ACEJF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $2.61B. CLPHF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $20.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACEJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLPHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACEJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLPHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACEJF is a better buy in the long-term than CLPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACEJF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLPHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACEJF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CLPHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLPHF is a better buy in the short-term than ACEJF.

Price Growth

ACEJF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLPHF (@Electric Utilities) price change was +9.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-0.71% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLPHF($20.6B) has a higher market cap than ACEJF($2.61B). CLPHF has higher P/E ratio than ACEJF: CLPHF (166.67) vs ACEJF (9.00). CLPHF YTD gains are higher at: 9.000 vs. ACEJF (0.000). CLPHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.2B vs. ACEJF (1.18B). CLPHF has more cash in the bank: 4.25B vs. ACEJF (1.43B). ACEJF has less debt than CLPHF: ACEJF (4.71B) vs CLPHF (59.4B). CLPHF has higher revenues than ACEJF: CLPHF (101B) vs ACEJF (5.07B).
ACEJFCLPHFACEJF / CLPHF
Capitalization2.61B20.6B13%
EBITDA1.18B12.2B10%
Gain YTD0.0009.000-
P/E Ratio9.00166.675%
Revenue5.07B101B5%
Total Cash1.43B4.25B34%
Total Debt4.71B59.4B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLPHF: Fundamental Ratings
CLPHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACEJFCLPHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
38%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ACEJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRPSX26.530.40
+1.53%
Nuveen Large Cap Responsible Eq Prem
PJRAX7.460.08
+1.08%
PGIM Quant Solutions International Eq A
EAPDX16.160.14
+0.87%
Parametric Dividend Income A
JGETX11.69N/A
N/A
JHancock Global Equity R4
SMVZX12.27N/A
N/A
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity R6

ACEJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACEJF and CLPHF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACEJF and CLPHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACEJF
1D Price
Change %
ACEJF100%
N/A
CLPHF - ACEJF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACLLF - ACEJF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
ABTZY - ACEJF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABZPY - ACEJF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AEMMY - ACEJF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPHF and ACEJF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPHF and ACEJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPHF
1D Price
Change %
CLPHF100%
N/A
ACEJF - CLPHF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CKISY - CLPHF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPHY - CLPHF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
CHUEF - CLPHF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGLNF - CLPHF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More