Ad is loading...
ACEYX vs HSHAX
ACEYX vs HSHAX Comparison
Open Charts ACEYX vs HSHAX
AB All China Equity Advisor
Price$8.58
Change-$0.03 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.76M
Hartford Schroders China A A
Price$10.31
Change-$0.06 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.68M
ACEYX vs HSHAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEYX vs. HSHAX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEYX is a Buy and HSHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACEYX has more cash in the bank: 47.8M vs. HSHAX (16.7M). ACEYX pays higher dividends than HSHAX: ACEYX (3.56) vs HSHAX (0.39). ACEYX was incepted earlier than HSHAX: ACEYX (7 years) vs HSHAX (5 years). HSHAX (2.10) is less costly to investors than ACEYX (1.60). ACEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. HSHAX (57.00). ACEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSHAX: ACEYX (0) vs HSHAX (2000). ACEYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. HSHAX (5.07). HSHAX return over 5 years is better than : -6.84 vs. ACEYX (-8.09).
| ACEYX | HSHAX | ACEYX / HSHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.45 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 2.10 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.654 | 1.576 | 486% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.8M | 16.7M | 286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.56 | 0.39 | 923% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | 5.07 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.51 | -10.63 | -61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.09 | -6.84 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...