Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEYX vs HSHAX
ACEYX vs HSHAX Comparison
Open Charts ACEYX vs HSHAX
AB All China Equity Advisor
Price$9.16
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.24M
Hartford Schroders China A A
Price$10.75
Change+$0.08 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.29M
ACEYX vs HSHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEYX vs. HSHAX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEYX is a Hold and HSHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACEYX has more cash in the bank: 50.2M vs. HSHAX (17.3M). ACEYX pays higher dividends than HSHAX: ACEYX (3.27) vs HSHAX (0.37). ACEYX was incepted earlier than HSHAX: ACEYX (7 years) vs HSHAX (5 years). HSHAX (2.10) is less costly to investors than ACEYX (1.60). ACEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. HSHAX (57.00). ACEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSHAX: ACEYX (0) vs HSHAX (2000). HSHAX (24.46) and ACEYX (23.89) have marching annual gain over last year. ACEYX return over 5 years is better than : -9.92 vs. HSHAX (-14.85).
| ACEYX | HSHAX | ACEYX / HSHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.45 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 2.10 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.931 | 5.911 | 253% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.2M | 17.3M | 290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 0.37 | 895% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.89 | 24.46 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.84 | -20.21 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.92 | -14.85 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement