Ad is loading...
ACEYX vs HSHFX
ACEYX vs HSHFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEYX vs HSHFX
AB All China Equity Advisor
Price$8.58
Change-$0.03 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.76M
Hartford Schroders China A F
Price$10.34
Change-$0.06 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.68M
ACEYX vs HSHFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEYX vs. HSHFX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEYX is a Buy and HSHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACEYX has more cash in the bank: 47.8M vs. HSHFX (16.7M). ACEYX pays higher dividends than HSHFX: ACEYX (3.56) vs HSHFX (0.86). ACEYX was incepted earlier than HSHFX: ACEYX (7 years) vs HSHFX (5 years). HSHFX (1.67) and ACEYX (1.60) have similar cost to investors . ACEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. HSHFX (57.00). ACEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSHFX: ACEYX (0) vs HSHFX (1000000). ACEYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. HSHFX (5.54). HSHFX return over 5 years is better than : -4.97 vs. ACEYX (-8.09).
| ACEYX | HSHFX | ACEYX / HSHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.99 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.67 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.654 | 1.772 | 432% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.8M | 16.7M | 286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.56 | 0.86 | 415% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | 5.54 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.51 | -9.51 | -68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.09 | -4.97 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...