Ad is loading...
ACEYX vs HSHRX
ACEYX vs HSHRX Comparison
Open Charts ACEYX vs HSHRX
AB All China Equity Advisor
Price$8.61
Change+$0.09 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.62M
Hartford Schroders China A SDR
Price$10.41
Change+$0.05 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.7M
ACEYX vs HSHRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEYX vs. HSHRX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEYX is a Buy and HSHRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACEYX has more cash in the bank: 47.6M vs. HSHRX (16.7M). ACEYX pays higher dividends than HSHRX: ACEYX (3.56) vs HSHRX (0.86). ACEYX was incepted earlier than HSHRX: ACEYX (7 years) vs HSHRX (5 years). HSHRX (1.67) and ACEYX (1.60) have similar cost to investors . ACEYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. HSHRX (57.00). ACEYX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSHRX: ACEYX (0) vs HSHRX (5000000). ACEYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.44 vs. HSHRX (7.59). HSHRX return over 5 years is better than : -4.78 vs. ACEYX (-8.73).
| ACEYX | HSHRX | ACEYX / HSHRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.99 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.67 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.901 | 1.868 | 369% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.6M | 16.7M | 285% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.56 | 0.86 | 416% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.44 | 7.59 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.12 | -7.84 | -91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.73 | -4.78 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...