ACLHF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 1 closing price
Capitalization
11.6M
SAIDF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.01 (-50.00%)
Updated
Mar 28 closing price
Capitalization
3.29M
Ad is loading...

ACLHF vs SAIDF

Header iconACLHF vs SAIDF Comparison
Open Charts ACLHF vs SAIDFBanner chart's image
Acme Lithium
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$125K
Capitalization11.6M
Fidelity Minerals
Price$0.01
Change-$0.01 (-50.00%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization3.29M
ACLHF vs SAIDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACLHF vs. SAIDF commentary
Apr 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACLHF is a Hold and SAIDF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 02, 2025
Stock price -- (ACLHF: $0.03 vs. SAIDF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: ACLHF and SAIDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACLHF: 271% vs. SAIDF: 130%
Market capitalization -- ACLHF: $11.6M vs. SAIDF: $3.29M
ACLHF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $11.6M. SAIDF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $3.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACLHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAIDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACLHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAIDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACLHF is a better buy in the long-term than SAIDF.

Price Growth

ACLHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +68.44% price change this week, while SAIDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -34.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-0.96% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACLHF($11.6M) has a higher market cap than SAIDF($3.29M). ACLHF YTD gains are higher at: 9.776 vs. SAIDF (-79.000). SAIDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.29M vs. ACLHF (-3.73M). ACLHF has more cash in the bank: 4.56M vs. SAIDF (698K). ACLHF has less debt than SAIDF: ACLHF (177K) vs SAIDF (250K). ACLHF (0) and SAIDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ACLHFSAIDFACLHF / SAIDF
Capitalization11.6M3.29M353%
EBITDA-3.73M-1.29M290%
Gain YTD9.776-79.000-12%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.56M698K653%
Total Debt177K250K71%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAIDF: Fundamental Ratings
SAIDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
98
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JGRQX15.620.04
+0.26%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth R3
RSSYX22.87N/A
N/A
Victory RS Select Growth Y
MMNBX9.90N/A
N/A
MassMutual Diversified Value Y
EAALX20.86N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Focused Gr A
TRZBX172.37N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Z

ACLHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACLHF and OMHLF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACLHF and OMHLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACLHF
1D Price
Change %
ACLHF100%
+5.27%
OMHLF - ACLHF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRKZF - ACLHF
10%
Poorly correlated
-7.42%
FXRVF - ACLHF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTRBF - ACLHF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAIDF - ACLHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SAIDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAIDF has been loosely correlated with KGLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAIDF jumps, then KGLLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAIDF
1D Price
Change %
SAIDF100%
N/A
KGLLF - SAIDF
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BNTRF - SAIDF
39%
Loosely correlated
-28.47%
MKRIF - SAIDF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FPRGF - SAIDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.28%
MLXEF - SAIDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.51%
More