Advertisement
ACLS vs HMN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACLS is a Hold and HMN is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHMN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ACLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACLS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HMN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACLS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HMN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ACLS (@Semiconductors) experienced а -5.29% price change this week, while HMN (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.17%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.39%.
Reported Earning Dates
ACLS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
HMN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (-2.02% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.62% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| ACLS | HMN | ACLS / HMN | |
| Capitalization | 3.64B | 1.5B | 243% |
| EBITDA | 297M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.531 | 10.327 | -160% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.15 | 33.55 | 45% |
| Revenue | 1.13B | 1.43B | 79% |
| Total Cash | 506M | 552M | 92% |
| Total Debt | 45.2M | 546M | 8% |
ACLS | HMN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HMN's Valuation (32) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as ACLS (49) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to ACLS’s over the last 12 months.
HMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACLS (78) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACLS’s over the last 12 months.
ACLS's SMR Rating (48) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HMN (92) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that ACLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HMN’s over the last 12 months.
HMN's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as ACLS (55) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to ACLS’s over the last 12 months.
ACLS's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as HMN (82) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that ACLS’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.
| ACLS | HMN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 58% |
Advertisement
ACLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACLS has been closely correlated with VECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACLS jumps, then VECO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACLS | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| VECO - ACLS | 81% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| LRCX - ACLS | 80% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| AMAT - ACLS | 79% Closely correlated | -2.91% | ||
| NVMI - ACLS | 79% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| KLAC - ACLS | 78% Closely correlated | -2.79% | ||
More | ||||
HMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMN has been closely correlated with CINF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HMN jumps, then CINF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMN | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| CINF - HMN | 68% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| L - HMN | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| SAFT - HMN | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| THG - HMN | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| CNA - HMN | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
More | ||||