ACM
Price
$114.97
Change
-$0.47 (-0.41%)
Updated
Jul 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.21B
33 days until earnings call
PWR
Price
$377.56
Change
-$8.24 (-2.14%)
Updated
Jul 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
55.95B
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACM vs PWR

Header iconACM vs PWR Comparison
Open Charts ACM vs PWRBanner chart's image
Aecom
Price$114.97
Change-$0.47 (-0.41%)
Volume$8.5K
Capitalization15.21B
Quanta Services
Price$377.56
Change-$8.24 (-2.14%)
Volume$2.16K
Capitalization55.95B
ACM vs PWR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACM vs. PWR commentary
Jul 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACM is a Buy and PWR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 09, 2025
Stock price -- (ACM: $114.94 vs. PWR: $377.56)
Brand notoriety: ACM and PWR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACM: 96% vs. PWR: 105%
Market capitalization -- ACM: $15.21B vs. PWR: $55.95B
ACM [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $15.21B. PWR’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $55.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ACM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the long-term than ACM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PWR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the short-term than ACM.

Price Growth

ACM (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +1.09% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +1.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +28.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +303.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACM is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

PWR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.29% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($56B) has a higher market cap than ACM($15.2B). PWR has higher P/E ratio than ACM: PWR (60.90) vs ACM (24.61). PWR YTD gains are higher at: 22.186 vs. ACM (8.410). PWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.25B vs. ACM (1.21B). ACM has less debt than PWR: ACM (3.02B) vs PWR (4.75B). PWR has higher revenues than ACM: PWR (24.9B) vs ACM (16B).
ACMPWRACM / PWR
Capitalization15.2B56B27%
EBITDA1.21B2.25B54%
Gain YTD8.41022.18638%
P/E Ratio24.6160.9040%
Revenue16B24.9B64%
Total Cash1.6BN/A-
Total Debt3.02B4.75B64%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACM vs PWR: Fundamental Ratings
ACM
PWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
725
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
129
SMR RATING
1..100
3557
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9928
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACM's Valuation (71) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (93). This means that ACM’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ACM (12). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to ACM’s over the last 12 months.

ACM's SMR Rating (35) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (57). This means that ACM’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACM (45). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACM’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACM (99). This means that PWR’s stock grew significantly faster than ACM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACMPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEPI40.670.17
+0.42%
Rex Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF
DAUG41.780.03
+0.07%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bfr ETF Aug
TAGS24.19N/A
N/A
Teucrium Agricultural Fund
IGOV42.56-0.21
-0.49%
iShares International Treasury Bond ETF
BGLD21.45-0.19
-0.86%
FT Vest Gold Strategy Qt Buffer ETF

PWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWR
1D Price
Change %
PWR100%
-0.18%
MTZ - PWR
84%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
PRIM - PWR
82%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
EME - PWR
82%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
STRL - PWR
79%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
MYRG - PWR
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
More