Ad is loading...
ACMDX vs CRAZX
ACMDX vs CRAZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACMDX vs. CRAZX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMDX is a Buy and CRAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.36B vs. ACMDX (24.4M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than ACMDX: CRAZX (2.51) vs ACMDX (0.56). ACMDX was incepted earlier than CRAZX: ACMDX (9 years) vs CRAZX (13 years). ACMDX (2.99) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). CRAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 190.00 vs. ACMDX (170.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACMDX: CRAZX (2000) vs ACMDX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.16 vs. ACMDX (1.53). ACMDX return over 5 years is better than : 12.44 vs. CRAZX (9.98).
| ACMDX | CRAZX | ACMDX / CRAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.83 | 0.81 | 349% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.99 | 0.81 | 369% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.962 | 1.154 | -83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.4M | 2.36B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 2.51 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.53 | 6.16 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.36 | 10.55 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.44 | 9.98 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...