Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACMDX vs CRAZX
ACMDX vs CRAZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACMDX vs. CRAZX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMDX is a StrongBuy and CRAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.37B vs. ACMDX (24.7M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than ACMDX: CRAZX (2.45) vs ACMDX (0.55). ACMDX was incepted earlier than CRAZX: ACMDX (9 years) vs CRAZX (13 years). ACMDX (2.99) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). CRAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 190.00 vs. ACMDX (170.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACMDX: CRAZX (2000) vs ACMDX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.69 vs. ACMDX (3.71). ACMDX return over 5 years is better than : 11.27 vs. CRAZX (8.30).
| ACMDX | CRAZX | ACMDX / CRAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.83 | 0.81 | 349% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.99 | 0.81 | 369% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.769 | 2.833 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.7M | 2.37B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 2.45 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.71 | 7.69 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.80 | 13.08 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.27 | 8.30 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 23.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement