Ad is loading...
ACMLF
Price
$6.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
LGIQ
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Earnings call today
Ad is loading...

ACMLF vs LGIQ

Header iconACMLF vs LGIQ Comparison
Open Charts ACMLF vs LGIQBanner chart's image
Ascom Holding AG
Price$6.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.44K
CapitalizationN/A
LOGIQ
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$27.33K
CapitalizationN/A
ACMLF vs LGIQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
LGIQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACMLF vs. LGIQ commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACMLF is a Hold and LGIQ is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ACMLF: $6.50 vs. LGIQ: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: ACMLF and LGIQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACMLF: 100% vs. LGIQ: 13%
Market capitalization -- ACMLF: $492.88M vs. LGIQ: $24.39M
ACMLF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $492.88M. LGIQ’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $24.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLGIQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LGIQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACMLF is a better buy in the long-term than LGIQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGIQ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LGIQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ACMLF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LGIQ (@Packaged Software) price change was -18.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

LGIQ is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACMLF($493M) has a higher market cap than LGIQ($24.4M). ACMLF YTD gains are higher at: -13.102 vs. LGIQ (-77.396). ACMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.4M vs. LGIQ (-27.5M). ACMLF has more cash in the bank: 26.6M vs. LGIQ (751K). LGIQ has less debt than ACMLF: LGIQ (14.2K) vs ACMLF (10M). ACMLF has higher revenues than LGIQ: ACMLF (297M) vs LGIQ (21.1M).
ACMLFLGIQACMLF / LGIQ
Capitalization493M24.4M2,020%
EBITDA25.4M-27.5M-92%
Gain YTD-13.102-77.39617%
P/E Ratio22.83N/A-
Revenue297M21.1M1,408%
Total Cash26.6M751K3,542%
Total Debt10M14.2K70,423%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGIQ: Fundamental Ratings
LGIQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGIQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LGIQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAGFF0.350.01
+2.83%
Aftermath Silver Ltd.
NTTYY24.900.64
+2.62%
Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Corp.
CZMWY61.52-0.24
-0.39%
Carl Zeiss Meditec AG
PALAF4.82-0.02
-0.41%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
SAUHY12.30-0.23
-1.84%
Straumann Holding AG

ACMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACMLF and AISXF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACMLF and AISXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACMLF
1D Price
Change %
ACMLF100%
N/A
AISXF - ACMLF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NEXPF - ACMLF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NMYSF - ACMLF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALAR - ACMLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
SPT - ACMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
More

LGIQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGIQ and BILL have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGIQ and BILL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGIQ
1D Price
Change %
LGIQ100%
N/A
BILL - LGIQ
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
SWISF - LGIQ
21%
Poorly correlated
+25.70%
ACMLF - LGIQ
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WIGBY - LGIQ
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSPD - LGIQ
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
More