It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCLPS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACN’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLPS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
ACN (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +1.43% price change this week, while CLPS (@Information Technology Services) price change was -4.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +4.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.90%.
ACN is expected to report earnings on Dec 19, 2024.
CLPS is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2023.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
ACN | CLPS | ACN / CLPS | |
Capitalization | 226B | 30.9M | 731,392% |
EBITDA | 11.2B | -1.29M | -870,970% |
Gain YTD | 4.865 | 16.366 | 30% |
P/E Ratio | 31.66 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 64.9B | 143M | 45,385% |
Total Cash | 5.01B | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 4.12B | 26.2M | 15,729% |
ACN | CLPS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ACN's Valuation (41) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CLPS (70). This means that ACN’s stock grew similarly to CLPS’s over the last 12 months.
ACN's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLPS (100). This means that ACN’s stock grew significantly faster than CLPS’s over the last 12 months.
ACN's SMR Rating (36) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLPS (90). This means that ACN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLPS’s over the last 12 months.
ACN's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CLPS (57). This means that ACN’s stock grew similarly to CLPS’s over the last 12 months.
CLPS's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ACN (65). This means that CLPS’s stock grew similarly to ACN’s over the last 12 months.
ACN | CLPS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago45% | 3 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | 3 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago87% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 3 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago58% | 5 days ago84% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago89% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACN has been loosely correlated with FLYW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACN jumps, then FLYW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ACN | 100% | -0.28% | ||
FLYW - ACN | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.74% | ||
CTSH - ACN | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
GIB - ACN | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
PSFE - ACN | 55% Loosely correlated | +5.38% | ||
AI - ACN | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPS and AI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPS and AI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLPS | 100% | +0.91% | ||
AI - CLPS | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
INOD - CLPS | 24% Poorly correlated | -5.05% | ||
AUR - CLPS | 21% Poorly correlated | +7.27% | ||
GLOB - CLPS | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
ACN - CLPS | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
More |