Ad is loading...
ACRG
Price
$5.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
FMELF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

ACRG vs FMELF

Header iconACRG vs FMELF Comparison
Open Charts ACRG vs FMELFBanner chart's image
American Clean Resources Group
Price$5.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.52K
CapitalizationN/A
FUTURE METALS NL
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$85K
CapitalizationN/A
ACRG vs FMELF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACRG vs. FMELF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACRG is a Hold and FMELF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ACRG: $5.05 vs. FMELF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: ACRG and FMELF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACRG: 263% vs. FMELF: 159%
Market capitalization -- ACRG: $5.4M vs. FMELF: $8.53M
ACRG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.4M. FMELF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACRG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFMELF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACRG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FMELF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ACRG and FMELF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

ACRG (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FMELF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACRG is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-2.07% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMELF($8.53M) has a higher market cap than ACRG($5.4M). ACRG YTD gains are higher at: -49.500 vs. FMELF (-94.286). ACRG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -158.1K vs. FMELF (-6.65M).
ACRGFMELFACRG / FMELF
Capitalization5.4M8.53M63%
EBITDA-158.1K-6.65M2%
Gain YTD-49.500-94.28653%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash658N/A-
Total Debt4.41MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACRG: Fundamental Ratings
ACRG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JNGSX12.010.02
+0.17%
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate D
TFEQX11.94-0.02
-0.17%
Templeton Instl Intl Eq Ser Primary
RIDHX25.69-0.11
-0.43%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R5E
APHTX24.54-0.20
-0.81%
Artisan Focus Fund Institutional
JGSVX22.43-0.47
-2.05%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth R5

ACRG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACRG and CHKKF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACRG and CHKKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACRG
1D Price
Change %
ACRG100%
N/A
CHKKF - ACRG
24%
Poorly correlated
-12.64%
VMSXF - ACRG
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMELF - ACRG
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LUGDF - ACRG
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
AYASF - ACRG
8%
Poorly correlated
+9.45%
More

FMELF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMELF and BTUMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMELF and BTUMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMELF
1D Price
Change %
FMELF100%
N/A
BTUMF - FMELF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACRG - FMELF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSTTF - FMELF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
VMSSF - FMELF
7%
Poorly correlated
+22.20%
ESGLF - FMELF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More