Ad is loading...
ACSLX vs GFAFX
ACSLX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts ACSLX vs GFAFX
American Century Select C
Price$83.14
Change-$0.15 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.43B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.87
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
ACSLX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACSLX vs. GFAFX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACSLX is a Buy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. ACSLX (5.43B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than ACSLX: GFAFX (0.35) vs ACSLX (0.00). ACSLX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: ACSLX (22 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). ACSLX (1.98) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ACSLX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACSLX: GFAFX (250) vs ACSLX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.06 vs. ACSLX (0.31). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.14 vs. ACSLX (20.79).
| ACSLX | GFAFX | ACSLX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.67 | 284% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.67 | 296% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.547 | -2.562 | 334% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.43B | 285B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.31 | 3.06 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.87 | 32.97 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.79 | 44.14 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.69 | 61.41 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers