ACT
Price
$32.92
Change
-$0.26 (-0.78%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.96B
66 days until earnings call
AMBC
Price
$11.62
Change
+$0.22 (+1.93%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
700.08M
3 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ACT vs AMBC

Header iconACT vs AMBC Comparison
Open Charts ACT vs AMBCBanner chart's image
Enact Holdings
Price$32.92
Change-$0.26 (-0.78%)
Volume$194.03K
Capitalization4.96B
Ambac Financial Group
Price$11.62
Change+$0.22 (+1.93%)
Volume$971.97K
Capitalization700.08M
ACT vs AMBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
ACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACT vs. AMBC commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACT is a Hold and AMBC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (ACT: $32.92 vs. AMBC: $11.62)
Brand notoriety: ACT and AMBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACT: 70% vs. AMBC: 196%
Market capitalization -- ACT: $4.96B vs. AMBC: $700.08M
ACT [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $4.96B. AMBC’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $700.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $14.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAMBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • AMBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACT is a better buy in the long-term than AMBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AMBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • AMBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMBC is a better buy in the short-term than ACT.

Price Growth

ACT (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -1.47% price change this week, while AMBC (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -0.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -2.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACT is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

AMBC is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-2.74% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACT($4.96B) has a higher market cap than AMBC($700M). AMBC has higher P/E ratio than ACT: AMBC (86.06) vs ACT (7.58). ACT YTD gains are higher at: 2.238 vs. AMBC (-8.142). ACT has more cash in the bank: 5.9B vs. AMBC (2.24B). ACT has less debt than AMBC: ACT (745M) vs AMBC (3.48B). ACT has higher revenues than AMBC: ACT (1.15B) vs AMBC (266M).
ACTAMBCACT / AMBC
Capitalization4.96B700M709%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.238-8.142-27%
P/E Ratio7.5886.069%
Revenue1.15B266M434%
Total Cash5.9B2.24B263%
Total Debt745M3.48B21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACT vs AMBC: Fundamental Ratings
ACT
AMBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8636
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21100
SMR RATING
1..100
8493
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
357
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACT's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBC (74) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that ACT’s stock grew similarly to AMBC’s over the last 12 months.

ACT's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMBC (100) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that ACT’s stock grew significantly faster than AMBC’s over the last 12 months.

ACT's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBC (93) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that ACT’s stock grew similarly to AMBC’s over the last 12 months.

ACT's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBC (59) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that ACT’s stock grew similarly to AMBC’s over the last 12 months.

AMBC's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as ACT (35) in the null industry. This means that AMBC’s stock grew similarly to ACT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACTAMBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RVNU25.240.12
+0.48%
Xtrackers Municipal Infras Rev Bd ETF
JETU28.27N/A
N/A
MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN
IBBQ22.95-0.02
-0.09%
Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF
DGRS50.05-0.96
-1.88%
WisdomTree US SmallCap Qual Div Gr ETF
FXO54.51-1.14
-2.05%
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX® ETF

AMBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBC has been loosely correlated with NMIH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBC jumps, then NMIH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBC
1D Price
Change %
AMBC100%
+1.93%
NMIH - AMBC
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
FNF - AMBC
38%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
ESNT - AMBC
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
ACT - AMBC
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
FAF - AMBC
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
More