It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACVA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
ACVA (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +2.48% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.79%.
ACVA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
ACVA | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACVA has been loosely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACVA jumps, then AN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ACVA | 100% | +0.91% | ||
AN - ACVA | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
CPRT - ACVA | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
RUSHB - ACVA | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
ABG - ACVA | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
LAD - ACVA | 51% Loosely correlated | -5.81% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BUYZ | 100% | +2.44% | ||
TOST - BUYZ | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.08% | ||
SPOT - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +6.06% | ||
FICO - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
ACVA - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
GDDY - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.59% | ||
More |