Ad is loading...
ACWV vs BLES
ACWV vs BLES Comparison
Open Charts ACWV vs BLES
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
Price$111.74
Change-$0.34 (-0.30%)
Volume$17.94K
Net Assets3.13B
Inspire Global Hope ETF
Price$34.80
Change-$1.30 (-3.60%)
Volume$538
Net Assets111.7M
ACWV vs BLES Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWV vs. BLES commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWV is a StrongBuy and BLES is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACWV has more net assets: 3.13B vs. BLES (112M). ACWV has a higher annual dividend yield than BLES: ACWV (2.637) vs BLES (-2.189). ACWV was incepted earlier than BLES: ACWV (13 years) vs BLES (8 years). ACWV (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than BLES (0.56). BLES has a higher turnover ACWV (25.00) vs ACWV (25.00).
| ACWV | BLES | ACWV / BLES | |
| Gain YTD | 2.637 | -2.189 | -120% |
| Net Assets | 3.13B | 112M | 2,794% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.56 | 36% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 41.00 | 61% |
| Yield | 2.19 | 1.70 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ACWV | BLES | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 79% | 9 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ACWV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACWV has been closely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACWV jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACWV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | 100% | +4.15% | ||
| LIN - ACWV | 71% Closely correlated | +7.90% | ||
| GD - ACWV | 61% Loosely correlated | +6.73% | ||
| BCE - ACWV | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| L - ACWV | 59% Loosely correlated | +5.99% | ||
| WTW - ACWV | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.18% | ||
More | ||||
BLES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLES has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLES jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLES | 100% | +8.02% | ||
| BN - BLES | 75% Closely correlated | +9.91% | ||
| CE - BLES | 72% Closely correlated | +17.10% | ||
| BAM - BLES | 72% Closely correlated | +9.60% | ||
| BEN - BLES | 70% Closely correlated | +11.52% | ||
| MIDD - BLES | 68% Closely correlated | +14.83% | ||
More | ||||