Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWV vs BLES
ACWV vs BLES Comparison
Open Charts ACWV vs BLES
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
Price$118.12
Change-$0.91 (-0.76%)
Volume$46.16K
Net Assets3.39B
Inspire Global Hope ETF
Price$40.20
Change-$0.30 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.66M
ACWV vs BLES Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWV vs. BLES commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWV is a Hold and BLES is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACWV has more net assets: 3.39B vs. BLES (118M). BLES has a higher annual dividend yield than ACWV: BLES (8.676) vs ACWV (8.223). ACWV was incepted earlier than BLES: ACWV (14 years) vs BLES (8 years). ACWV (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than BLES (0.58). BLES has a higher turnover ACWV (25.00) vs ACWV (25.00).
| ACWV | BLES | ACWV / BLES | |
| Gain YTD | 8.223 | 8.676 | 95% |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 118M | 2,876% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.58 | 34% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 41.00 | 61% |
| Yield | 2.15 | 1.62 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ACWV | BLES | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 68% | 23 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ACWV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACWV has been closely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACWV jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACWV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | 100% | -0.71% | ||
| LIN - ACWV | 76% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| GD - ACWV | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| BCE - ACWV | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| WTW - ACWV | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| L - ACWV | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||
BLES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLES has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLES jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLES | 100% | -1.00% | ||
| BN - BLES | 75% Closely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| CE - BLES | 72% Closely correlated | -3.94% | ||
| BAM - BLES | 72% Closely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| BEN - BLES | 70% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| MIDD - BLES | 68% Closely correlated | -1.87% | ||
More | ||||