APH | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ADME | APH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago43% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago53% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago57% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago52% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago59% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago69% | 5 days ago48% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago54% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago62% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADME has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ADME jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADME | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ADME | 100% | -3.85% | ||
MSFT - ADME | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.36% | ||
APH - ADME | 62% Loosely correlated | -7.72% | ||
AMAT - ADME | 59% Loosely correlated | -8.28% | ||
AMZN - ADME | 59% Loosely correlated | -8.98% | ||
MA - ADME | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.07% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APH has been closely correlated with CLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APH jumps, then CLS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
APH | 100% | -7.72% | ||
CLS - APH | 70% Closely correlated | -15.98% | ||
FN - APH | 63% Loosely correlated | -14.52% | ||
TEL - APH | 60% Loosely correlated | -8.65% | ||
LFUS - APH | 58% Loosely correlated | -17.28% | ||
SANM - APH | 57% Loosely correlated | -10.77% | ||
More |