Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADOCX vs NLSCX
ADOCX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts ADOCX vs NLSCX
Alger Dynamic Opportunities C
Price$18.90
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.52M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.29
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.39B
ADOCX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADOCX vs. NLSCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADOCX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. ADOCX (210M). ADOCX (0.00) and NLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . ADOCX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: ADOCX (14 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). ADOCX (2.83) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). ADOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSCX (48.00). ADOCX (1000) and NLSCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ADOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.44 vs. NLSCX (7.23). ADOCX return over 5 years is better than : 24.65 vs. NLSCX (22.24).
| ADOCX | NLSCX | ADOCX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.83 | 2.43 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.83 | 2.43 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.221 | 3.109 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 210M | 7.39B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.44 | 7.23 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.68 | 11.91 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.65 | 22.24 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.75 | 33.82 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement