Ad is loading...
ADOCX vs NLSCX
ADOCX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts ADOCX vs NLSCX
Alger Dynamic Opportunities C
Price$18.90
Change+$0.09 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.32M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.87
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.17B
ADOCX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADOCX vs. NLSCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADOCX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.17B vs. ADOCX (213M). NLSCX pays higher dividends than ADOCX: NLSCX (0.03) vs ADOCX (0.00). ADOCX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: ADOCX (14 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). ADOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 350.56 vs. NLSCX (54.00). ADOCX (1000) and NLSCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ADOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.86 vs. NLSCX (6.83). ADOCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.32 vs. NLSCX (20.37).
| ADOCX | NLSCX | ADOCX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.675 | 0.848 | 315% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 7.17B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.03 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.86 | 6.83 | 335% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.01 | 6.58 | 274% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.32 | 20.37 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.32 | 34.48 | 178% |