Ad is loading...
ADOCX vs NLSCX
ADOCX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts ADOCX vs NLSCX
Alger Dynamic Opportunities C
Price$17.15
Change+$0.08 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets186.84M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.02
Change-$0.04 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7B
ADOCX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADOCX vs. NLSCX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADOCX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7B vs. ADOCX (187M). ADOCX (0.00) and NLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . ADOCX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: ADOCX (14 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). ADOCX (2.83) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). ADOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSCX (48.00). ADOCX (1000) and NLSCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ADOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.47 vs. NLSCX (0.65). ADOCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.43 vs. NLSCX (22.27).
| ADOCX | NLSCX | ADOCX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.83 | 2.43 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.83 | 2.43 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.823 | -3.561 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 187M | 7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.47 | 0.65 | 688% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.31 | 2.65 | 313% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.43 | 22.27 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.01 | 23.81 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...