Ad is loading...
ADOCX vs NLSCX
ADOCX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts ADOCX vs NLSCX
Alger Dynamic Opportunities C
Price$18.01
Change-$0.34 (-1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.89M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.10
Change-$0.08 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.48B
ADOCX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADOCX vs. NLSCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADOCX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.48B vs. ADOCX (205M). NLSCX pays higher dividends than ADOCX: NLSCX (0.03) vs ADOCX (0.00). ADOCX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: ADOCX (14 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). ADOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 350.56 vs. NLSCX (54.00). ADOCX (1000) and NLSCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ADOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.98 vs. NLSCX (7.13). ADOCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.78 vs. NLSCX (20.79).
| ADOCX | NLSCX | ADOCX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.164 | 2.770 | 6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 205M | 7.48B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.03 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.98 | 7.13 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.58 | 10.79 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.78 | 20.79 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.78 | 32.97 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...