Ad is loading...
ADOZX vs NLSAX
ADOZX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts ADOZX vs NLSAX
Alger Dynamic Opportunities Z
Price$21.65
Change+$0.10 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.23M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.83
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
ADOZX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADOZX vs. NLSAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADOZX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. ADOZX (201M). ADOZX (0.00) and NLSAX (0.00) have matching dividends . ADOZX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: ADOZX (14 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). ADOZX (1.75) and NLSAX (1.68) have similar cost to investors . ADOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ADOZX: NLSAX (1000) vs ADOZX (500000). ADOZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.47 vs. NLSAX (6.86). ADOZX return over 5 years is better than : 31.88 vs. NLSAX (30.31).
| ADOZX | NLSAX | ADOZX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.68 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.68 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.553 | 2.059 | -75% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 201M | 7.33B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.47 | 6.86 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.69 | 15.84 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.88 | 30.31 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.44 | 41.58 | 162% |