Ad is loading...
ADOZX vs NLSAX
ADOZX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts ADOZX vs NLSAX
Alger Dynamic Opportunities Z
Price$20.19
Change+$0.11 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.5M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.42
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.29B
ADOZX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADOZX vs. NLSAX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADOZX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.29B vs. ADOZX (185M). ADOZX (0.00) and NLSAX (0.00) have matching dividends . ADOZX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: ADOZX (14 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). ADOZX (1.75) and NLSAX (1.68) have similar cost to investors . ADOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ADOZX: NLSAX (1000) vs ADOZX (500000). ADOZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.91 vs. NLSAX (6.23). ADOZX return over 5 years is better than : 42.10 vs. NLSAX (32.27).
| ADOZX | NLSAX | ADOZX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.68 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.68 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.715 | 0.758 | -885% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 185M | 7.29B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.91 | 6.23 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.32 | 11.71 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.10 | 32.27 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.91 | 41.94 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...