Ad is loading...
AEEIX vs CSFZX
AEEIX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts AEEIX vs CSFZX
AB Global Real Estate Investment I
Price$13.71
Change+$0.70 (+5.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.01M
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$49.44
Change+$2.52 (+5.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
AEEIX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEEIX vs. CSFZX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEEIX is a Buy and CSFZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. AEEIX (34M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than AEEIX: CSFZX (2.79) vs AEEIX (2.06). AEEIX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: AEEIX (20 years) vs CSFZX (11 years). AEEIX (1.42) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). AEEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CSFZX (52.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEEIX: CSFZX (0) vs AEEIX (2000000). AEEIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.36 vs. CSFZX (-6.11). AEEIX (17.56) and CSFZX (17.11) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AEEIX | CSFZX | AEEIX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.84 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.84 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.445 | -8.090 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34M | 1.91B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 2.79 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.36 | -6.11 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.89 | -19.96 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.56 | 17.11 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.15 | 20.91 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...