Compare trend and price AEHL vs LMB
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEHL is a Hold and LMB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AEHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LMB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LMB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AEHL (@Building Products) experienced а -8.08% price change this week, while LMB (@Building Products) price change was +4.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.11%.
Reported Earning Dates
LMB is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (+1.26% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| AEHL | LMB | AEHL / LMB | |
| Capitalization | 10.1M | 454M | 2% |
| EBITDA | -5.16M | 38.4M | -13% |
| Gain YTD | -29.838 | -1.364 | 2,188% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.62 | 23.57 | 3% |
| Revenue | 286M | 516M | 55% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 59.8M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 42M | - |
AEHL | LMB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 44 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LMB's Valuation (87) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as AEHL (97) in the Building Products industry. This means that LMB’s stock grew similarly to AEHL’s over the last 12 months.
LMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Miscellaneous industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEHL (100) in the Building Products industry. This means that LMB’s stock grew significantly faster than AEHL’s over the last 12 months.
LMB's SMR Rating (49) in the Miscellaneous industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEHL (99) in the Building Products industry. This means that LMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEHL’s over the last 12 months.
LMB's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as AEHL (59) in the Building Products industry. This means that LMB’s stock grew similarly to AEHL’s over the last 12 months.
LMB's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as AEHL (82) in the Building Products industry. This means that LMB’s stock grew similarly to AEHL’s over the last 12 months.
| LMB | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
AEHL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AEHL and ILAG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AEHL and ILAG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEHL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEHL | 100% | -3.70% | ||
| ILAG - AEHL | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.40% | ||
| IR - AEHL | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| BLDR - AEHL | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.36% | ||
| OC - AEHL | 9% Poorly correlated | +3.01% | ||
| LMB - AEHL | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.28% | ||
More | ||||
LMB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMB has been loosely correlated with TTEK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMB jumps, then TTEK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMB | 100% | -1.28% | ||
| TTEK - LMB | 38% Loosely correlated | +6.11% | ||
| JELD - LMB | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| PRIM - LMB | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| BLDR - LMB | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.36% | ||
| TREX - LMB | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
More | ||||