AEHL vs PGTI ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEHL is a Hold and PGTI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePGTI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AEHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PGTI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
AEHL (@Building Products) experienced а -2.56% price change this week, while PGTI (@Building Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
PGTI is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (+0.06% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| AEHL | PGTI | AEHL / PGTI | |
| Capitalization | 10.1M | 2.4B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -5.16M | 241M | -2% |
| Gain YTD | -26.754 | 3.170 | -844% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.62 | 22.95 | 3% |
| Revenue | 286M | 1.5B | 19% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 32.7M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 746M | - |
AEHL | PGTI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 29 | 23 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PGTI's Valuation (78) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as AEHL (97). This means that PGTI’s stock grew similarly to AEHL’s over the last 12 months.
PGTI's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEHL (100). This means that PGTI’s stock grew significantly faster than AEHL’s over the last 12 months.
PGTI's SMR Rating (55) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEHL (99). This means that PGTI’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEHL’s over the last 12 months.
PGTI's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as AEHL (49). This means that PGTI’s stock grew similarly to AEHL’s over the last 12 months.
PGTI's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEHL (80). This means that PGTI’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEHL’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
AEHL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AEHL and ILAG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AEHL and ILAG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEHL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEHL | 100% | -6.40% | ||
| ILAG - AEHL | 23% Poorly correlated | -18.36% | ||
| IR - AEHL | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| BLDR - AEHL | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.48% | ||
| OC - AEHL | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.02% | ||
| LMB - AEHL | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.86% | ||
More | ||||
PGTI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGTI has been loosely correlated with BECN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PGTI jumps, then BECN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGTI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGTI | 100% | N/A | ||
| BECN - PGTI | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| BXC - PGTI | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| TREX - PGTI | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| APOG - PGTI | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| IR - PGTI | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
More | ||||