AEM
Price
$94.46
Change
+$4.35 (+4.83%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
29.62B
13 days until earnings call
GOTRF
Price
$1.33
Change
+$0.09 (+7.26%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
59.38M
Ad is loading...

AEM vs GOTRF

Header iconAEM vs GOTRF Comparison
Open Charts AEM vs GOTRFBanner chart's image
Agnico Eagle Mines
Price$94.46
Change+$4.35 (+4.83%)
Volume$2.72M
Capitalization29.62B
Goliath Resources
Price$1.33
Change+$0.09 (+7.26%)
Volume$258.52K
Capitalization59.38M
AEM vs GOTRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GOTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. GOTRF commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Buy and GOTRF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (AEM: $94.46 vs. GOTRF: $1.33)
Brand notoriety: AEM and GOTRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 165% vs. GOTRF: 260%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $29.62B vs. GOTRF: $59.38M
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $29.62B. GOTRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $59.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGOTRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GOTRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the long-term than GOTRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GOTRF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GOTRF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GOTRF is a better buy in the short-term than AEM.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +6.49% price change this week, while GOTRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +33.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.95% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($29.6B) has a higher market cap than GOTRF($59.4M). GOTRF YTD gains are higher at: 86.014 vs. AEM (20.777). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.94B vs. GOTRF (-19.54M). AEM has more cash in the bank: 349M vs. GOTRF (2.31M). GOTRF has less debt than AEM: GOTRF (8.35K) vs AEM (2.01B). AEM has higher revenues than GOTRF: AEM (6.63B) vs GOTRF (0).
AEMGOTRFAEM / GOTRF
Capitalization29.6B59.4M49,832%
EBITDA3.94B-19.54M-20,171%
Gain YTD20.77786.01424%
P/E Ratio15.52N/A-
Revenue6.63B0-
Total Cash349M2.31M15,115%
Total Debt2.01B8.35K24,026,363%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs GOTRF: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
GOTRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2729
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3330
SMR RATING
1..100
83100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3935
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GOTRF's Valuation (87) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (96). This means that GOTRF’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

GOTRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (33). This means that GOTRF’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as GOTRF (100). This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to GOTRF’s over the last 12 months.

GOTRF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (39). This means that GOTRF’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GOTRF (100). This means that AEM’s stock grew significantly faster than GOTRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMGOTRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GOTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIMO53.572.31
+4.51%
Silicon Motion Technology Corp
STAG34.470.61
+1.80%
Stag Industrial
BP31.610.48
+1.54%
BP plc
TOPS6.300.09
+1.37%
TOP Ships
OPY72.520.14
+0.19%
Oppenheimer Holdings

GOTRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOTRF has been loosely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GOTRF jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GOTRF
1D Price
Change %
GOTRF100%
+7.26%
WPM - GOTRF
41%
Loosely correlated
+4.43%
PAAS - GOTRF
40%
Loosely correlated
+6.78%
BTG - GOTRF
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.39%
MAG - GOTRF
39%
Loosely correlated
+6.75%
AEM - GOTRF
38%
Loosely correlated
+4.83%
More