Advertisement
AEM vs PAAS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) vs. Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- AEM reported record Q1 2026 net income of $1.7 billion and free cash flow of $730 million, boosting investor confidence amid high gold prices.
- PAAS awaits Q1 2026 earnings on May 5, with analysts raising EPS estimates and price targets to $65, signaling optimism for silver production growth.
- AEM year-to-date (YTD) return stands at +8.47%, outperforming PAAS's +1.41%, reflecting stronger momentum in recent market activity.
- Both stocks carry Strong Buy analyst ratings, with AEM average target of $253 (38% upside from $183.56) and PAAS $72 (39% from $51.81).
- AEM's beta of 0.57 indicates lower volatility compared to PAAS's 1.53, appealing to stability-focused investors.
Introduction
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) are prominent precious metals producers, with AEM focused primarily on gold and PAAS emphasizing silver alongside gold output. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, financial metrics, and market positioning amid elevated gold and silver prices in recent weeks. Traders seeking exposure to commodities-driven equities and investors tracking mining sector relative performance will find insights into growth drivers, risks, and momentum differences valuable for portfolio decisions.
AEM Overview and Recent Performance
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is a leading gold producer with operations across Canada, Europe, Latin America, and Australia. In recent market activity, the stock has navigated volatility, trading around $183.56 with a market cap of $92 billion as of early May 2026. Q1 2026 results highlighted record quarterly operating margins, net income of $1.7 billion, and 825,000 ounces of gold production, driven by strong metal prices and cost discipline. Despite beating earnings estimates, shares dipped post-release amid broader profit-taking in miners. Sentiment remains positive, supported by a low beta of 0.57 (volatility measure relative to the market), PE ratio (price-to-earnings) of 17.27, and analyst targets averaging $253. Expansion in Finland and robust free cash flow of $730 million further bolster long-term outlook.
PAAS Overview and Recent Performance
Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) ranks as a top silver producer with significant gold byproducts, operating mines primarily in the Americas. Shares recently traded near $51.81, with a $21.9 billion market cap. In recent weeks, performance has shown resilience, with gains outperforming the sector amid silver price strength. Q1 2026 earnings, due May 5, project 6.4 million silver ounces (up 28% year-over-year), fueling optimism. Higher beta of 1.53 reflects greater sensitivity to metals prices, while PE ratio of 20.24 and forward PE of 11.35 suggest growth potential. Analyst upgrades, including Scotiabank's $65 target, and projects like La Colorada skarn have lifted sentiment, though YTD gains trail peers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 351 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend trading, swing trades, and momentum plays on timeframes from 5 minutes to 49 days, delivering annualized returns of 23% to 163%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Some target precious metals miners (up to 18 tickers in gold/silver/copper), alongside sectors like semiconductors and data centers. Virtual agents offer risk-managed copy trading, while signal agents provide flexible entry. Explore these high-performing bots to align with current market conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
AEM and PAAS both benefit from soaring precious metals prices, but differ in scale and exposure: AEM's 3.45 million ounces annual gold output dwarfs PAAS's silver leverage (22.8 million ounces attributable). Growth drivers include AEM's Finnish expansions versus PAAS's La Colorada advancements. Recent momentum favors AEM with superior YTD returns and proven Q1 execution, while PAAS offers higher beta for upside in silver rallies. Risks encompass commodity volatility and geopolitical factors in mining regions; AEM edges in stability and market cap, trading at a discount to peers on forward multiples.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward AEM based on consistent trend strength post-Q1 record results, lower volatility, and superior relative YTD positioning amid gold's stability. PAAS holds appeal for silver catalysts ahead of earnings, but AEM's scale and cash generation provide a probabilistic edge in the near term.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Hold and PAAS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.62% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
AEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (+1.32% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| AEM | PAAS | AEM / PAAS | |
| Capitalization | 81.4B | 20.3B | 401% |
| EBITDA | 9.74B | 2.22B | 440% |
| Gain YTD | -3.656 | -6.535 | 56% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.31 | 15.19 | 101% |
| Revenue | 13.5B | 4B | 338% |
| Total Cash | 3.12B | 1.61B | 193% |
| Total Debt | 319M | 845M | 38% |
AEM | PAAS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAAS's Valuation (18) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (93) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (59) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (45) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (62) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (95) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
| AEM | PAAS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 65% |
Advertisement