Advertisement
AEM vs PAAS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) vs. Pan American Silver (PAAS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- AEM (Agnico Eagle Mines) and PAAS (Pan American Silver) represent leading precious metals producers with exposure to gold and silver price movements, respectively, in a sector influenced by macroeconomic factors and metal demand.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks experiencing pressure, with AEM declining approximately 7.5% over the past month amid analyst target reductions and upcoming earnings.
- PAAS has posted mixed recent performance, with modest monthly declines but stronger longer-term gains, supported by operational expansions and upcoming quarterly results.
- AEM benefits from a larger scale, lower debt levels, and record prior-quarter margins tied to elevated gold prices, while PAAS offers direct silver leverage with ongoing project developments.
- Sector sentiment remains tied to precious metals volatility, with both companies preparing for earnings releases that could clarify momentum in the current environment.
- Relative positioning favors stability factors for AEM in head-to-head metrics such as profitability margins and institutional ownership.
Introduction
Investors and traders often compare AEM (Agnico Eagle Mines) and PAAS (Pan American Silver) to assess relative value within the precious metals mining sector. These stocks provide exposure to gold and silver, commodities sensitive to inflation, interest rates, and industrial demand. This comparison appeals to those seeking diversified holdings in mining equities, portfolio rebalancing opportunities, or analysis of how company-specific factors influence performance amid fluctuating metal prices and market conditions.
AEM Overview and Recent Performance
Agnico Eagle Mines operates as a senior gold producer with mines primarily in Canada, Australia, and other regions. The company has demonstrated operational strength, including record quarterly margins in earlier 2026 results driven by high realized gold prices. In recent weeks, AEM shares have traded lower, reflecting a roughly 7.5% decline over the past month alongside reduced analyst price targets from firms including JPMorgan. Sentiment has been tempered by upcoming second-quarter earnings scheduled for July 29, 2026, with mixed ratings such as a Zacks Strong Sell designation offset by some Moderate Buy consensus views. Broader market activity in precious metals has contributed to volatility without clear directional dominance in the short term.
PAAS Overview and Recent Performance
Pan American Silver focuses on silver production with operations across the Americas and select gold exposure. The company has pursued expansions, including at its La Colorada and Timmins projects, alongside consistent dividend and cash flow generation. Recent weeks have seen PAAS exhibit modest declines of 1-3% in the past month, with the share price hovering near $44 amid fluctuating analyst targets—some raised and others lowered. Upcoming second-quarter results on August 12, 2026, represent a key near-term catalyst. Performance has benefited from longer-term silver price trends, though short-term momentum remains influenced by sector-wide factors and mixed institutional signals.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots page that highlights select AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. While the platform offers hundreds of AI trading bots capable of trading thousands of different tickers across varied strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles, only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current data trends and statistical robustness earn placement in the trending section. Available bots span diverse styles with metrics such as win rates, profit factors, and drawdown statistics that can range widely depending on configuration and historical testing periods. This section provides traders with accessible insights into automated approaches without favoring any single methodology. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.
Head-to-Head Comparison
AEM operates at greater scale as a pure-play gold miner with lower leverage and higher net margins compared to PAAS, which derives primary revenue from silver and carries more operational complexity across multiple jurisdictions. Growth drivers differ markedly: AEM emphasizes consistent production from established assets and shareholder returns via dividends and buybacks, while PAAS focuses on silver-specific catalysts and project expansions that could amplify upside in rising silver price environments. Recent momentum shows AEM under greater near-term pressure from analyst revisions, whereas PAAS displays relatively resilient longer-term returns. Risk factors include metal price sensitivity for both, with AEM potentially benefiting from lower debt-to-equity ratios and PAAS exposed to higher volatility typical of mid-tier silver producers. Market sentiment reflects institutional preference for AEM on profitability metrics, though both maintain exposure to the same macroeconomic tailwinds in precious metals.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, balance sheet stability, and relative positioning within the sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term characteristics to AEM over PAAS. This assessment draws from AEM’s scale advantages and lower leverage amid recent market activity, though outcomes remain probabilistic and dependent on upcoming earnings and broader commodity movements.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Buy and PAAS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PAAS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was -2.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -26.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
AEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-1.69% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| AEM | PAAS | AEM / PAAS | |
| Capitalization | 73.4B | 18.2B | 403% |
| EBITDA | 9.74B | 2.22B | 440% |
| Gain YTD | -13.945 | -16.301 | 86% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.44 | 13.60 | 91% |
| Revenue | 13.5B | 4B | 338% |
| Total Cash | 3.12B | 1.61B | 193% |
| Total Debt | 319M | 845M | 38% |
AEM | PAAS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 63 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 21 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAAS's Valuation (17) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (92) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (63) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (44) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (60) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (97) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
| AEM | PAAS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 68% |
Advertisement
AEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEM has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AEM jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.