Advertisement
AEM vs WPM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) vs. Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- AEM has delivered stronger year-to-date gains of approximately 8.5% compared to WPM's 7.3%, benefiting from sustained gold price strength.
- Recent weeks saw AEM post record quarterly profits amid production growth, though shares dipped post-earnings due to market volatility.
- WPM expanded its royalty portfolio with deals like the Antamina silver stream acquisition, offering lower operational risk exposure.
- Both stocks face sector headwinds, with AEM down about 12% over the past month and WPM around 8.5%, lagging broader materials gains.
- AEM's operational momentum and higher relative strength position it favorably for gold rally continuation versus WPM's streaming stability.
Introduction
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) represent key players in the precious metals sector, with AEM as a leading gold producer and WPM as a prominent streaming and royalty company. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors seeking diversified exposure to gold and silver amid ongoing market volatility, inflation concerns, and geopolitical tensions driving safe-haven demand. Traders monitoring relative performance in basic materials can use these insights to assess momentum, risk profiles, and positioning in the current environment.
AEM Overview and Recent Performance
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is a Canadian-based gold producer with operations across Canada, Europe, Latin America, and Australia, focusing on high-quality, low-cost assets. In recent market activity, AEM reported record first-quarter profits driven by strong production and higher gold prices, alongside expansions like the Finland project. Shares exhibited resilience year-to-date, gaining around 8.5%, though recent weeks saw a pullback of about 12% amid broader sector pressures and post-earnings profit-taking. Sentiment remains supported by operational catalysts and bullish analyst targets averaging over $200, reflecting confidence in sustained output growth.
WPM Overview and Recent Performance
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) operates as a precious metals streaming company, providing upfront capital to miners in exchange for future production at fixed low costs, minimizing direct operational risks. Recent developments include portfolio expansions such as acquiring BHP's stake in the Antamina silver stream and a deal with Spanish Mountain Gold, enhancing silver and gold exposure. Year-to-date performance stands at approximately 7.3%, with shares declining around 8.5% over the past month due to market volatility. Positive relative strength upgrades and buy ratings underscore its appeal for stable leverage to metal prices.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from its library of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. Only 25 bots earn a spot here, selected by AI analysis for their suitability to current market conditions like volatility and sector rotations in semiconductors, industrials, gold miners, and AI infrastructure. These bots deliver impressive stats, including annualized returns from +23% to +162%, win rates of 51%-88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 49 days and varying risk profiles via take-profit/stop-loss corridors. Examples include high-win-rate semiconductor bots like those targeting NVDA/AVGO with 68%+ returns. Explore these for real-time signals and copy trading tailored to today's dynamics.
Head-to-Head Comparison
AEM and WPM both capitalize on precious metals rallies but differ in business models: AEM's direct mining involves higher capex and operational risks (e.g., labor, regulations), while WPM's streaming offers lower-cost, fixed-price exposure with less execution risk. Growth drivers contrast too—AEM via organic production expansions, WPM through deal-making. Recent momentum favors AEM with superior YTD returns and trend consistency, though WPM shows stability in drawdowns. Risk factors include metal price sensitivity for both, but AEM faces mine-specific issues versus WPM's counterparty reliance. Sector exposure leans gold-heavy for AEM, silver-diversified for WPM, with market sentiment tilting toward producers amid supply constraints.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors AEM over WPM, based on stronger trend consistency, superior year-to-date relative performance, and robust production catalysts positioning it better for ongoing gold momentum. While WPM offers attractive stability, AEM's operational leverage provides higher probabilistic upside in the prevailing environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a StrongBuy and WPM is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWPM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WPM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WPM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- WPM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.26% price change this week, while WPM (@Precious Metals) price change was +10.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.64%.
Reported Earning Dates
AEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
WPM is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (+5.22% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| AEM | WPM | AEM / WPM | |
| Capitalization | 98.5B | 65.3B | 151% |
| EBITDA | 9.74B | 2.4B | 406% |
| Gain YTD | 14.172 | 18.337 | 77% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.53 | 36.34 | 51% |
| Revenue | 13.5B | 2.75B | 492% |
| Total Cash | 3.12B | 2.17B | 144% |
| Total Debt | 319M | 7.66M | 4,163% |
AEM | WPM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WPM's Valuation (21) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (96) in the null industry. This means that WPM’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.
WPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (27) in the null industry. This means that WPM’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
WPM's SMR Rating (43) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (43) in the null industry. This means that WPM’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
WPM's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (49) in the null industry. This means that WPM’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as WPM (94) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.
| AEM | WPM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 70% | 8 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BBJP | 74.88 | 0.90 | +1.22% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | |||
| IPAV | 35.20 | 0.31 | +0.88% |
| Global X Infrastructure Dev ex-U.S. ETF | |||
| TVAL | 40.02 | 0.29 | +0.73% |
| T. Rowe Price Value ETF | |||
| EJUL | 31.06 | 0.14 | +0.45% |
| Innovator Emerging Power Bffr ETF July | |||
| ABCS | 32.06 | 0.08 | +0.24% |
| Alpha Blue Capital US Sm-Md Cp Dyn ETF | |||