Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs NBNAX
AEPCX vs NBNAX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs NBNAX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$57.89
Change+$0.37 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.77B
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$15.45
Change+$0.17 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.9M
AEPCX vs NBNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. NBNAX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and NBNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. NBNAX (227M). NBNAX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: NBNAX (0.80) vs AEPCX (0.32). AEPCX was incepted earlier than NBNAX: AEPCX (24 years) vs NBNAX (18 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than NBNAX (1.34). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEPCX (35.00). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: AEPCX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). NBNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.97 vs. AEPCX (5.30). NBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.14 vs. AEPCX (15.32).
| AEPCX | NBNAX | AEPCX / NBNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.16 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.34 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.038 | 19.582 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 227M | 59,471% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.80 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.30 | 14.97 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.79 | 36.22 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.32 | 30.14 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.43 | 46.96 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement