Ad is loading...
AEPGX vs FCIRX
AEPGX vs FCIRX Comparison
Open Charts AEPGX vs FCIRX
American Funds Europacific Growth A
Price$51.84
Change+$0.09 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.3B
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl A
Price$15.68
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets786.45M
AEPGX vs FCIRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPGX vs. FCIRX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPGX is a Hold and FCIRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPGX has more cash in the bank: 116B vs. FCIRX (786M). AEPGX pays higher dividends than FCIRX: AEPGX (1.11) vs FCIRX (0.41). AEPGX was incepted earlier than FCIRX: AEPGX (41 years) vs FCIRX (8 years). FCIRX (1.19) is less costly to investors than AEPGX (0.85). AEPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIRX (12.00). AEPGX (6%) and FCIRX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. AEPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIRX: AEPGX (250) vs FCIRX (15000). FCIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.66 vs. AEPGX (-10.26). FCIRX return over 5 years is better than : 55.48 vs. AEPGX (19.75).
| AEPGX | FCIRX | AEPGX / FCIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.19 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.19 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.667 | -3.150 | 116% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 15000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116B | 786M | 14,758% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.41 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.26 | -3.66 | 280% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.53 | 9.22 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.75 | 55.48 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...