Ad is loading...
AEPGX vs FCIWX
AEPGX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts AEPGX vs FCIWX
American Funds Europacific Growth A
Price$51.75
Change+$2.46 (+4.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.84B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$15.76
Change+$0.71 (+4.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets747.66M
AEPGX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPGX vs. FCIWX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPGX is a Hold and FCIWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPGX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. FCIWX (748M). AEPGX pays higher dividends than FCIWX: AEPGX (1.11) vs FCIWX (0.68). AEPGX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: AEPGX (41 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). FCIWX (0.89) and AEPGX (0.85) have similar cost to investors . AEPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIWX (12.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPGX: FCIWX (0) vs AEPGX (250). FCIWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.86 vs. AEPGX (-15.15). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 50.74 vs. AEPGX (14.06).
| AEPGX | FCIWX | AEPGX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.80 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.89 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.246 | -7.612 | 108% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111B | 748M | 14,840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.68 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.15 | -8.86 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.51 | 3.94 | -242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.06 | 50.74 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.24 | N/A | - |