AETUF
Price
$17.51
Change
+$0.08 (+0.46%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
9.18B
59 days until earnings call
MNR
Price
$13.91
Change
-$0.10 (-0.71%)
Updated
Mar 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.83B
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AETUF vs MNR

Header iconAETUF vs MNR Comparison
Open Charts AETUF vs MNRBanner chart's image
Arc Resources
Price$17.51
Change+$0.08 (+0.46%)
Volume$9.35K
Capitalization9.18B
Mach Natural Resources
Price$13.91
Change-$0.10 (-0.71%)
Volume$300
Capitalization1.83B
AETUF vs MNR Comparison Chart
Loading...
AETUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AETUF vs. MNR commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AETUF is a Hold and MNR is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (AETUF: $17.51 vs. MNR: $14.01)
Brand notoriety: AETUF and MNR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AETUF: 31% vs. MNR: 66%
Market capitalization -- AETUF: $9.18B vs. MNR: $1.83B
AETUF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $9.18B. MNR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $1.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AETUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AETUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AETUF is a better buy in the long-term than MNR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AETUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AETUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MNR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNR is a better buy in the short-term than AETUF.

Price Growth

AETUF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -4.81% price change this week, while MNR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -5.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

AETUF is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

MNR is expected to report earnings on May 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-1.18% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AETUF($9.19B) has a higher market cap than MNR($1.83B). AETUF has higher P/E ratio than MNR: AETUF (4.39) vs MNR (3.69). AETUF YTD gains are higher at: -3.340 vs. MNR (-15.780). AETUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.24B vs. MNR (628M). MNR has less debt than AETUF: MNR (104M) vs AETUF (1.93B). AETUF has higher revenues than MNR: AETUF (9.51B) vs MNR (1.03B).
AETUFMNRAETUF / MNR
Capitalization9.19B1.83B501%
EBITDA5.24B628M835%
Gain YTD-3.340-15.78021%
P/E Ratio4.393.69119%
Revenue9.51B1.03B921%
Total Cash4.4MN/A-
Total Debt1.93B104M1,855%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AETUF vs MNR: Fundamental Ratings
AETUF
MNR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15100
SMR RATING
1..100
5487
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5176
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1922
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3748

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNR's Valuation (2) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AETUF (42) in the null industry. This means that MNR’s stock grew somewhat faster than AETUF’s over the last 12 months.

AETUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNR (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that AETUF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNR’s over the last 12 months.

AETUF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNR (87) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that AETUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNR’s over the last 12 months.

AETUF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MNR (76) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that AETUF’s stock grew similarly to MNR’s over the last 12 months.

AETUF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as MNR (22) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that AETUF’s stock grew similarly to MNR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AETUFMNR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AETUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HENKY21.070.39
+1.89%
Henkel AG & Co. KGAA
IQST0.15N/A
+0.86%
iQSTEL Inc.
PROSY9.64-0.06
-0.62%
Prosus NV
GEBHY3.56-0.04
-1.11%
Genting Berhad
ERFSF54.36-3.09
-5.38%
Eurofins Scientific Nante

AETUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AETUF has been closely correlated with TRMLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AETUF jumps, then TRMLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AETUF
1D Price
Change %
AETUF100%
+0.48%
TRMLF - AETUF
73%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
SPGYF - AETUF
71%
Closely correlated
+2.52%
BTE - AETUF
70%
Closely correlated
+3.05%
MEGEF - AETUF
69%
Closely correlated
+3.80%
CRLFF - AETUF
68%
Closely correlated
+1.91%
More

MNR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNR has been loosely correlated with CHRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNR jumps, then CHRD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNR
1D Price
Change %
MNR100%
+2.04%
CHRD - MNR
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
CTRA - MNR
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.27%
MGY - MNR
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.88%
CRK - MNR
38%
Loosely correlated
+6.21%
VTLE - MNR
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More