AETUF
Price
$16.50
Change
-$0.52 (-3.06%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
50 days until earnings call
MNR
Price
$15.62
Change
-$0.14 (-0.89%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

AETUF vs MNR

Header iconAETUF vs MNR Comparison
Open Charts AETUF vs MNRBanner chart's image
Arc Resources
Price$16.50
Change-$0.52 (-3.06%)
Volume$318.56K
CapitalizationN/A
Mach Natural Resources
Price$15.62
Change-$0.14 (-0.89%)
Volume$252.25K
CapitalizationN/A
AETUF vs MNR Comparison Chart
Loading...
AETUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AETUF vs. MNR commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AETUF is a Hold and MNR is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AETUF: $16.50 vs. MNR: $15.62)
Brand notoriety: AETUF and MNR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AETUF: 42% vs. MNR: 112%
Market capitalization -- AETUF: $9.18B vs. MNR: $1.83B
AETUF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $9.18B. MNR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $1.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AETUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AETUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AETUF is a better buy in the long-term than MNR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AETUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNR’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AETUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MNR’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNR is a better buy in the short-term than AETUF.

Price Growth

AETUF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -8.33% price change this week, while MNR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +3.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +44.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

AETUF is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.

MNR is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+44.99% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AETUF($9.19B) has a higher market cap than MNR($1.83B). AETUF has higher P/E ratio than MNR: AETUF (4.39) vs MNR (3.69). MNR YTD gains are higher at: 12.225 vs. AETUF (10.813). AETUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.24B vs. MNR (628M). MNR has less debt than AETUF: MNR (104M) vs AETUF (1.93B). AETUF has higher revenues than MNR: AETUF (9.51B) vs MNR (1.03B).
AETUFMNRAETUF / MNR
Capitalization9.19B1.83B501%
EBITDA5.24B628M835%
Gain YTD10.81312.22588%
P/E Ratio4.393.69119%
Revenue9.51B1.03B921%
Total Cash4.4MN/A-
Total Debt1.93B104M1,855%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AETUF vs MNR: Fundamental Ratings
AETUF
MNR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
737
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1766
SMR RATING
1..100
5290
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5654
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3825
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNR's Valuation (1) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AETUF (41) in the null industry. This means that MNR’s stock grew somewhat faster than AETUF’s over the last 12 months.

AETUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNR (66) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that AETUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNR’s over the last 12 months.

AETUF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNR (90) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that AETUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNR’s over the last 12 months.

MNR's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AETUF (56) in the null industry. This means that MNR’s stock grew similarly to AETUF’s over the last 12 months.

MNR's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AETUF (38) in the null industry. This means that MNR’s stock grew similarly to AETUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AETUFMNR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AETUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRILX13.03-0.30
-2.25%
Neuberger Berman International Sel R6
EQNIX20.78-0.55
-2.58%
MFS Equity Income I
WQAUX11.40-0.33
-2.81%
Westwood Quality AllCap Ultra
FDCAX41.88-1.28
-2.97%
Fidelity Capital Appreciation
JGISX84.35-2.82
-3.24%
JPMorgan U.S. GARP Equity R6

AETUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AETUF has been closely correlated with TRMLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AETUF jumps, then TRMLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AETUF
1D Price
Change %
AETUF100%
-3.04%
TRMLF - AETUF
73%
Closely correlated
-2.35%
SPGYF - AETUF
71%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
BTE - AETUF
70%
Closely correlated
-3.42%
MEGEF - AETUF
69%
Closely correlated
-3.61%
CRLFF - AETUF
68%
Closely correlated
-2.33%
More

MNR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNR has been loosely correlated with CTRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNR jumps, then CTRA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNR
1D Price
Change %
MNR100%
-0.89%
CTRA - MNR
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.18%
CHRD - MNR
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.08%
VTLE - MNR
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.82%
CRK - MNR
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.54%
BIREF - MNR
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
More