AETUF
Price
$18.36
Change
+$0.17 (+0.94%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
9.18B
19 days until earnings call
SPGYF
Price
$6.92
Change
-$0.03 (-0.43%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.81B
Ad is loading...

AETUF vs SPGYF

Header iconAETUF vs SPGYF Comparison
Open Charts AETUF vs SPGYFBanner chart's image
Arc Resources
Price$18.36
Change+$0.17 (+0.94%)
Volume$13.67K
Capitalization9.18B
Whitecap Resources
Price$6.92
Change-$0.03 (-0.43%)
Volume$33.06K
Capitalization4.81B
AETUF vs SPGYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AETUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPGYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AETUF vs. SPGYF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AETUF is a Hold and SPGYF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AETUF: $18.35 vs. SPGYF: $6.91)
Brand notoriety: AETUF and SPGYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AETUF: 44% vs. SPGYF: 46%
Market capitalization -- AETUF: $9.18B vs. SPGYF: $4.81B
AETUF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $9.18B. SPGYF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $4.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AETUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSPGYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AETUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SPGYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AETUF is a better buy in the long-term than SPGYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AETUF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPGYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AETUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SPGYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SPGYF is a better buy in the short-term than AETUF.

Price Growth

AETUF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -2.88% price change this week, while SPGYF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -5.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

AETUF is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.24% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AETUF($9.19B) has a higher market cap than SPGYF($4.81B). SPGYF has higher P/E ratio than AETUF: SPGYF (5.96) vs AETUF (4.39). AETUF YTD gains are higher at: 1.325 vs. SPGYF (-2.468). AETUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.24B vs. SPGYF (2.38B). AETUF has more cash in the bank: 4.4M vs. SPGYF (0). SPGYF has less debt than AETUF: SPGYF (1.29B) vs AETUF (1.93B). AETUF has higher revenues than SPGYF: AETUF (9.51B) vs SPGYF (4.19B).
AETUFSPGYFAETUF / SPGYF
Capitalization9.19B4.81B191%
EBITDA5.24B2.38B220%
Gain YTD1.325-2.468-54%
P/E Ratio4.395.9674%
Revenue9.51B4.19B227%
Total Cash4.4M0-
Total Debt1.93B1.29B150%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AETUF vs SPGYF: Fundamental Ratings
AETUF
SPGYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5019
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1645
SMR RATING
1..100
5254
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4354
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2963
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SPGYF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as AETUF (41). This means that SPGYF’s stock grew similarly to AETUF’s over the last 12 months.

AETUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as SPGYF (45). This means that AETUF’s stock grew similarly to SPGYF’s over the last 12 months.

AETUF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SPGYF (54). This means that AETUF’s stock grew similarly to SPGYF’s over the last 12 months.

AETUF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SPGYF (54). This means that AETUF’s stock grew similarly to SPGYF’s over the last 12 months.

AETUF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPGYF (63). This means that AETUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPGYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AETUFSPGYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AETUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPGYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GABGX113.581.32
+1.18%
Gabelli Growth AAA
LAMPX23.280.16
+0.69%
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth P
NWQFX34.700.20
+0.58%
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Value R6
AYBLX11.290.06
+0.53%
Pioneer Balanced ESG Y
GSVRF0.13N/A
-0.34%
GUANAJUATO SILVER CO LTD

AETUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AETUF has been closely correlated with TRMLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AETUF jumps, then TRMLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AETUF
1D Price
Change %
AETUF100%
+0.96%
TRMLF - AETUF
73%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
SPGYF - AETUF
71%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
BTE - AETUF
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
MEGEF - AETUF
69%
Closely correlated
+1.49%
CRLFF - AETUF
68%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
More

SPGYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPGYF has been closely correlated with VRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPGYF jumps, then VRN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPGYF
1D Price
Change %
SPGYF100%
-0.36%
VRN - SPGYF
80%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
BTE - SPGYF
79%
Closely correlated
N/A
ZPTAF - SPGYF
77%
Closely correlated
-2.71%
OBE - SPGYF
75%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
VET - SPGYF
75%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
More