AEVA vs BCAN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEVA is a Hold and BCAN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEVA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBCAN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AEVA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BCAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEVA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCAN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AEVA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- BCAN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AEVA (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.89% price change this week, while BCAN (@Packaged Software) price change was -8.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
AEVA is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.15% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| AEVA | BCAN | AEVA / BCAN | |
| Capitalization | 218M | 1.11M | 19,604% |
| EBITDA | -140.08M | -3.92M | 3,577% |
| Gain YTD | -6.316 | -44.151 | 14% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 102.04 | - |
| Revenue | 4.31M | 1.11M | 390% |
| Total Cash | 221M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 7.35M | N/A | - |
| AEVA | BCAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 70% | 11 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 80% | 11 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 74% | 11 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 71% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 87% | 11 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PAXLX | 12.96 | 0.09 | +0.70% |
| Impax Large Cap Fund Individual Investor | |||
| PZIMX | 12.31 | 0.08 | +0.65% |
| Pzena Mid Cap Value Instl | |||
| TOWTX | 14.20 | 0.08 | +0.57% |
| Towpath Technology Inst | |||
| JIGHX | 27.30 | 0.08 | +0.29% |
| JHancock International Growth NAV | |||
| IGHAX | 11.90 | 0.03 | +0.25% |
| Voya Global High Dividend Low Vol Port A | |||
AEVA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEVA has been loosely correlated with LAZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AEVA jumps, then LAZR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEVA | 100% | +1.37% | ||
| LAZR - AEVA | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| INVZ - AEVA | 53% Loosely correlated | -5.81% | ||
| QS - AEVA | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| HYLN - AEVA | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| APTV - AEVA | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
More | ||||
BCAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCAN has been loosely correlated with SPPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCAN jumps, then SPPL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCAN | 100% | -3.06% | ||
| SPPL - BCAN | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.55% | ||
| ALLT - BCAN | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
| AEVA - BCAN | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
| MSAI - BCAN | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
| CISO - BCAN | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.00% | ||
More | ||||