AEVA vs SPPL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEVA is a StrongBuy and SPPL is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEVA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSPPL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AEVA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SPPL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEVA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPPL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AEVA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SPPL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
AEVA (@Packaged Software) experienced а +12.94% price change this week, while SPPL (@Packaged Software) price change was +9.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +7.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.05%.
Reported Earning Dates
AEVA is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+7.01% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| AEVA | SPPL | AEVA / SPPL | |
| Capitalization | 218M | 13M | 1,677% |
| EBITDA | -140.08M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -23.980 | -93.318 | 26% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4.31M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 221M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 7.35M | N/A | - |
| AEVA | SPPL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 87% | 15 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BRSVX | 40.75 | N/A | N/A |
| Bridgeway Small-Cap Value | |||
| LGLUX | 42.26 | -0.06 | -0.14% |
| Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R5 | |||
| MKSCX | 12.27 | -0.03 | -0.24% |
| BlackRock Sustainable Advantage Gbl Eq K | |||
| GTLLX | 34.82 | -0.13 | -0.37% |
| Glenmede Quant US Large Cap Gr Eq | |||
| BNUEX | 10.46 | -0.04 | -0.38% |
| UBS International Sustainable Equity P | |||
AEVA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEVA has been loosely correlated with LAZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AEVA jumps, then LAZR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEVA | 100% | -2.37% | ||
| LAZR - AEVA | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| INVZ - AEVA | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| QS - AEVA | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.33% | ||
| HYLN - AEVA | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| APTV - AEVA | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||
SPPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPPL has been loosely correlated with BCAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPPL jumps, then BCAN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPPL | 100% | +2.31% | ||
| BCAN - SPPL | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| MSAI - SPPL | 26% Poorly correlated | -6.85% | ||
| ASAN - SPPL | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
| AEVA - SPPL | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.37% | ||
| JTAI - SPPL | 12% Poorly correlated | -5.26% | ||
More | ||||