It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEXAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCNDT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNDT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
AEXAF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -49.35% price change this week, while CNDT (@Information Technology Services) price change was -4.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.65%.
CNDT is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
AEXAF | CNDT | AEXAF / CNDT | |
Capitalization | 3.01B | 627M | 480% |
EBITDA | -3.68B | 472M | -779% |
Gain YTD | -95.032 | 7.397 | -1,285% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 1.76 | - |
Revenue | 10.1B | 3.63B | 278% |
Total Cash | 776M | 300M | 259% |
Total Debt | 5.87B | 1.02B | 577% |
AEXAF | CNDT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 1 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AEXAF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CNDT (33) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that AEXAF’s stock grew similarly to CNDT’s over the last 12 months.
AEXAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CNDT (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that AEXAF’s stock grew similarly to CNDT’s over the last 12 months.
CNDT's SMR Rating (84) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as AEXAF (100) in the null industry. This means that CNDT’s stock grew similarly to AEXAF’s over the last 12 months.
CNDT's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEXAF (98) in the null industry. This means that CNDT’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEXAF’s over the last 12 months.
AEXAF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNDT (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that AEXAF’s stock grew significantly faster than CNDT’s over the last 12 months.
CNDT | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago72% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
IPOYX | 19.37 | 0.02 | +0.10% |
Delaware Ivy Systematic Em Mkts Eq Y | |||
FAVAX | 25.39 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
Fidelity Advisor Equity Value A | |||
MDODX | 10.34 | -0.07 | -0.67% |
Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity R6 | |||
PLFPX | 29.51 | -0.39 | -1.30% |
Principal Large Cap S&P 500 Index R5 | |||
HISGX | 11.51 | -0.21 | -1.79% |
Harbor Small Cap Growth Inv |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AEXAF and AEXAY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AEXAF and AEXAY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEXAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AEXAF | 100% | N/A | ||
AEXAY - AEXAF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CATG - AEXAF | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
APLD - AEXAF | 11% Poorly correlated | +5.39% | ||
CNDT - AEXAF | 8% Poorly correlated | -3.21% | ||
IBEX - AEXAF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.88% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNDT has been loosely correlated with ASGN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNDT jumps, then ASGN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNDT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CNDT | 100% | -3.21% | ||
ASGN - CNDT | 50% Loosely correlated | -4.25% | ||
CNXC - CNDT | 42% Loosely correlated | -3.77% | ||
EXLS - CNDT | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
TTEC - CNDT | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
III - CNDT | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
More |