CNDT
Price
$1.34
Change
+$0.03 (+2.29%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
207.83M
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
III
Price
$4.05
Change
+$0.06 (+1.50%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
193.99M
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNDT vs III

CNDT vs III Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) vs. Information Services Group, Inc. (III) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • III has delivered stronger year-to-date (YTD) performance at +27.88% compared to CNDT's +11.46%.
  • III maintains profitability with a trailing twelve months (TTM) earnings per share (EPS) of $0.19 and a 4.37% dividend yield, while CNDT reports negative EPS of -$1.14 and no dividend.
  • CNDT's market cap stands at $264 million, slightly above III's $196 million, reflecting comparable small-cap positioning.
  • Recent recognition positions CNDT as a leader in healthcare payer operations, bolstering niche sentiment.
  • III benefits from ongoing AI research initiatives, aligning with technology sector momentum.
  • Both stocks exhibit elevated volatility with betas above 1.0, but III shows lower risk at 1.11 versus CNDT's 1.24.

Introduction

This comparison examines CNDT and III, two small-cap stocks in the business services sector offering distinct exposures. CNDT focuses on process outsourcing across commercial, government, and transportation verticals, while III specializes in AI-driven technology research and advisory. Traders scanning for relative performance in volatile markets and investors eyeing value amid tech tailwinds or operational efficiency plays will find value here. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in momentum, profitability, and sector catalysts, aiding informed positioning in today's environment.

CNDT Overview and Recent Performance

Conduent Incorporated (CNDT) delivers digital business process services through its Commercial, Government, and Transportation segments, handling areas like customer experience management, healthcare administration, and tolling solutions. In recent weeks, shares have hovered around $1.70, reflecting a 52-week range of $1.15 to $2.98 and YTD gains of 11.46%. Fourth-quarter 2025 results showed revenue of $770 million but missed expectations, contributing to tempered sentiment amid ongoing restructuring and high debt levels (total debt-to-equity at 101.69%). Positive notes include recognition as a leader in Everest Group's 2026 Healthcare Payer Intelligent Operations assessment, supporting niche growth potential in government and healthcare processing. Elevated beta (1.24) underscores volatility tied to macroeconomic pressures on outsourcing demand.

III Overview and Recent Performance

Information Services Group, Inc. (III) operates as an AI-centered technology research and advisory firm, providing digital transformation, market intelligence, and governance services across industries like financial services and manufacturing. Shares recently traded near $4.12 within a 52-week range of $3.61 to $6.45, boasting robust YTD returns of 27.88%. Recent market activity features announcements on studies of AI service providers, including agentic and generative AI, fueling positive sentiment in the tech advisory space. Q4 2025 revenue reached $61.2 million, meeting guidance, with TTM profit margins at 3.82% and a dividend yield of 4.37% attracting income-focused holders. Beta of 1.11 indicates moderate volatility, balanced by AI sector tailwinds.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers using diverse strategies, timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 days, and styles like swing trading, day trading, trend following, and corridor take-profit/stop-loss exits. The curated Trending AI Robots section spotlights the most suitable for current market conditions based on metrics such as annualized returns ranging from +15% to +169%, win rates of 48% to 88%, profit factors from 1.5 to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios up to 21.5 across 1 to 25 tickers per bot—often in semiconductors, industrials, and tech. Examples include semiconductor-focused agents with +70% to +104% returns and high win rates. These virtual agents offer copy-trading potential for varied risk appetites; explore the page to identify alignments with your portfolio.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CNDT emphasizes scalable business process outsourcing (BPO) with broad sector exposure, contrasting III's niche in AI-enhanced advisory and research. Growth drivers differ: CNDT relies on cost efficiencies and government contracts amid revenue pressures ($3.04 billion TTM), while III leverages AI/digital demand ($245 million TTM). Recent momentum favors III with superior YTD gains and positive EPS versus CNDT's losses. Risk profiles highlight trade-offs: CNDT faces margin erosion (-5.59%) and leverage concerns, while III offers stability through dividends despite smaller scale. Both navigate business services, but III's AI positioning captures stronger market sentiment amid tech rallies.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI models would likely favor III in the current environment, given its trend consistency, positive profitability, dividend support, and AI catalysts amid sector strength. CNDT trails on relative positioning and stability, though healthcare leadership provides upside potential. This assessment reflects observable momentum rather than guarantees.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CNDT vs. III commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNDT is a Hold and III is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (CNDT: $1.31 vs. III: $3.99)
Brand notoriety: CNDT and III are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNDT: 91% vs. III: 144%
Market capitalization -- CNDT: $207.83M vs. III: $190.88M
CNDT [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $207.83M. III’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $190.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $249.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $8.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNDT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIII’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNDT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • III’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNDT is a better buy in the long-term than III.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNDT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while III’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNDT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • III’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNDT is a better buy in the short-term than III.

Price Growth

CNDT (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -11.49% price change this week, while III (@Information Technology Services) price change was -2.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -5.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +63.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNDT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

III is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (-5.07% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNDT($208M) has a higher market cap than III($194M). III has higher P/E ratio than CNDT: III (19.00) vs CNDT (13.62). III YTD gains are higher at: -29.421 vs. CNDT (-31.771). CNDT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 110M vs. III (24.8M). CNDT has more cash in the bank: 228M vs. III (22.7M). III has less debt than CNDT: III (67.8M) vs CNDT (879M). CNDT has higher revenues than III: CNDT (3.01B) vs III (246M).
CNDTIIICNDT / III
Capitalization208M194M107%
EBITDA110M24.8M444%
Gain YTD-31.771-29.421108%
P/E Ratio13.6219.0072%
Revenue3.01B246M1,225%
Total Cash228M22.7M1,004%
Total Debt879M67.8M1,296%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNDT vs III: Fundamental Ratings
CNDT
III
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6266
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9768
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6262
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
284
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

III's Valuation (6) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNDT (48). This means that III’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNDT’s over the last 12 months.

III's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CNDT (100). This means that III’s stock grew similarly to CNDT’s over the last 12 months.

III's SMR Rating (68) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CNDT (97). This means that III’s stock grew similarly to CNDT’s over the last 12 months.

III's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CNDT (62). This means that III’s stock grew similarly to CNDT’s over the last 12 months.

CNDT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for III (84). This means that CNDT’s stock grew significantly faster than III’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNDTIII
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNDT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
III
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DCINX24.73N/A
N/A
Dunham International Stock C
INDCX14.74N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Disciplined Growth C
FVLKX16.58N/A
N/A
Fidelity Value K
FSDPX102.49N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Materials
HEIFX14.16N/A
N/A
Hennessy Equity and Income Investor

CNDT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNDT has been loosely correlated with III. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNDT jumps, then III could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNDT
1D Price
Change %
CNDT100%
-6.43%
III - CNDT
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
CNXC - CNDT
40%
Loosely correlated
-4.59%
DXC - CNDT
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.72%
VYX - CNDT
38%
Loosely correlated
-6.28%
PSFE - CNDT
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
More

III and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, III has been loosely correlated with CNDT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if III jumps, then CNDT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To III
1D Price
Change %
III100%
-0.50%
CNDT - III
46%
Loosely correlated
-6.43%
PAY - III
42%
Loosely correlated
-4.08%
FLYW - III
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.71%
DXC - III
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.72%
IBM - III
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
More