AFAR
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
64M
PLMJ
Price
$11.75
Change
+$0.05 (+0.43%)
Updated
Jan 24, 03:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
242.07M
Ad is loading...

AFAR vs PLMJ

Header iconAFAR vs PLMJ Comparison
Open Charts AFAR vs PLMJBanner chart's image
Aura FAT Projects Acquisition
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization64M
Plum Acquisition
Price$11.75
Change+$0.05 (+0.43%)
Volume$300
Capitalization242.07M
AFAR vs PLMJ Comparison Chart
Loading...
PLMJ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFAR vs. PLMJ commentary
Jan 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFAR is a Hold and PLMJ is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 24, 2025
Stock price -- (AFAR: $11.68 vs. PLMJ: $11.70)
Brand notoriety: AFAR and PLMJ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFAR: 100% vs. PLMJ: 703%
Market capitalization -- AFAR: $64M vs. PLMJ: $242.07M
AFAR [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $64M. PLMJ’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $242.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFAR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLMJ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFAR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLMJ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLMJ is a better buy in the long-term than AFAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLMJ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PLMJ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

AFAR (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PLMJ (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +3.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +3.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFAR is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2023.

PLMJ is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+3.26% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLMJ($242M) has a higher market cap than AFAR($64M). AFAR has higher P/E ratio than PLMJ: AFAR (50.41) vs PLMJ (35.43). PLMJ YTD gains are higher at: 5.216 vs. AFAR (0.000).
AFARPLMJAFAR / PLMJ
Capitalization64M242M26%
EBITDA-1.58MN/A-
Gain YTD0.0005.216-
P/E Ratio50.4135.43142%
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash44.7KN/A-
Total Debt84KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFARPLMJ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
5%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
15%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
25%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
2%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PLMJ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APHHX19.870.08
+0.40%
Artisan Global Equity Institutional
IBNCX23.880.06
+0.25%
Macquarie Balanced Fund Class C
FRURX22.680.05
+0.22%
Franklin Utilities R
FEOPX16.82N/A
N/A
Fidelity Enduring Opportunities
UPMMX20.52-0.10
-0.48%
Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Cl A

AFAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFAR has been loosely correlated with AFARU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFAR jumps, then AFARU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFAR
1D Price
Change %
AFAR100%
N/A
AFARU - AFAR
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PLMIU - AFAR
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PLMJ - AFAR
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.36%
IVCAU - AFAR
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MITA - AFAR
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PLMJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLMJ has been loosely correlated with RFACU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLMJ jumps, then RFACU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLMJ
1D Price
Change %
PLMJ100%
+2.36%
RFACU - PLMJ
40%
Loosely correlated
-27.20%
SKGR - PLMJ
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
AFAR - PLMJ
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSLMF - PLMJ
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMIU - PLMJ
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More