AFCG
Price
$4.54
Change
-$1.16 (-20.32%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
248.83M
58 days until earnings call
PK
Price
$9.90
Change
-$0.55 (-5.26%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.68B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFCG vs PK

Header iconAFCG vs PK Comparison
Open Charts AFCG vs PKBanner chart's image
Advanced Flower Capital
Price$4.54
Change-$1.16 (-20.32%)
Volume$1.3M
Capitalization248.83M
Park Hotels & Resorts
Price$9.90
Change-$0.55 (-5.26%)
Volume$4.53M
Capitalization3.68B
AFCG vs PK Comparison Chart
Loading...
AFCG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFCG vs. PK commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFCG is a Hold and PK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (AFCG: $4.55 vs. PK: $9.90)
Brand notoriety: AFCG and PK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFCG: 756% vs. PK: 97%
Market capitalization -- AFCG: $248.83M vs. PK: $3.68B
AFCG [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $248.83M. PK’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $3.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFCG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFCG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFCG is a better buy in the long-term than PK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFCG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFCG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFCG is a better buy in the short-term than PK.

Price Growth

AFCG (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -17.06% price change this week, while PK (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -3.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFCG is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

PK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.02% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PK($3.68B) has a higher market cap than AFCG($249M). PK has higher P/E ratio than AFCG: PK (39.98) vs AFCG (11.80). PK YTD gains are higher at: -27.986 vs. AFCG (-43.297). AFCG has less debt than PK: AFCG (130M) vs PK (4.71B). PK has higher revenues than AFCG: PK (2.7B) vs AFCG (54.3M).
AFCGPKAFCG / PK
Capitalization249M3.68B7%
EBITDAN/A683M-
Gain YTD-43.297-27.986155%
P/E Ratio11.8039.9830%
Revenue54.3M2.7B2%
Total CashN/A717M-
Total Debt130M4.71B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PK: Fundamental Ratings
PK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
53
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
85
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFCGPK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFCG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIVCX33.84-0.43
-1.25%
Macquarie Opportunity C
REUYX44.46-0.61
-1.35%
Russell Sustnbl Aware Eq Y
HGOIX65.37-0.94
-1.42%
Hartford Growth Opportunities I
BMPIX104.82-1.83
-1.72%
ProFunds Materials UltraSector Inv
OBSIX25.01-0.48
-1.88%
Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Instl

AFCG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFCG has been loosely correlated with AHH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFCG jumps, then AHH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFCG
1D Price
Change %
AFCG100%
-20.40%
AHH - AFCG
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
OUT - AFCG
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.17%
RHP - AFCG
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.28%
STWD - AFCG
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
PK - AFCG
47%
Loosely correlated
-5.26%
More