AFG
Price
$141.39
Change
-$0.90 (-0.63%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.73B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
L
Price
$114.96
Change
-$0.19 (-0.17%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
23.69B
24 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFG vs L

AFG vs L Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFG vs. L commentary
Jul 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFG is a Buy and L is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 10, 2026
Stock price -- (AFG: $142.29 vs. L: $115.15)
Brand notoriety: AFG and L are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFG: 114% vs. L: 96%
Market capitalization -- AFG: $11.73B vs. L: $23.69B
AFG [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $11.73B. L’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $23.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $134.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $13.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • L’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFG is a better buy in the long-term than L.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFG’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while L’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • L’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AFG and L are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AFG (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.32% price change this week, while L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFG is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

L is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.33% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($23.7B) has a higher market cap than AFG($11.7B). L has higher P/E ratio than AFG: L (14.65) vs AFG (13.41). L YTD gains are higher at: 9.469 vs. AFG (6.757). L has more cash in the bank: 7.51B vs. AFG (2.04B). AFG has less debt than L: AFG (1.82B) vs L (8.93B). L has higher revenues than AFG: L (18.2B) vs AFG (8.11B).
AFGLAFG / L
Capitalization11.7B23.7B49%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.7579.46971%
P/E Ratio13.4114.6592%
Revenue8.11B18.2B45%
Total Cash2.04B7.51B27%
Total Debt1.82B8.93B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFG vs L: Fundamental Ratings
AFG
L
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2519
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
217
SMR RATING
1..100
5292
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4629
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4853
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AFG's Valuation (37) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (58). This means that AFG’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AFG (21). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to AFG’s over the last 12 months.

AFG's SMR Rating (52) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for L (92). This means that AFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AFG (46). This means that L’s stock grew similarly to AFG’s over the last 12 months.

AFG's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (53). This means that AFG’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PDLB19.890.32
+1.64%
Ponce Financial Group
GECC5.270.07
+1.35%
Great Elm Capital Corp
PGNY31.070.31
+1.01%
Progyny
PEN317.950.67
+0.21%
Penumbra
BTSGU237.87-0.67
-0.28%
BrightSpring Health Services

AFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFG has been closely correlated with AXS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFG jumps, then AXS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFG
1D Price
Change %
AFG100%
+0.77%
AXS - AFG
74%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
THG - AFG
68%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
HIG - AFG
68%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
TRV - AFG
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
L - AFG
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
More

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
-0.04%
HIG - L
86%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
CNA - L
80%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
AXS - L
76%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
CINF - L
73%
Closely correlated
-3.38%
TRV - L
73%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
More