AFG
Price
$135.14
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
11.28B
13 days until earnings call
WRB
Price
$59.19
Change
-$0.31 (-0.52%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
22.69B
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AFG vs WRB

Header iconAFG vs WRB Comparison
Open Charts AFG vs WRBBanner chart's image
American Financial Group
Price$135.14
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$321.25K
Capitalization11.28B
WR Berkley
Price$59.19
Change-$0.31 (-0.52%)
Volume$2.31M
Capitalization22.69B
AFG vs WRB Comparison Chart
Loading...
AFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFG vs. WRB commentary
Jan 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFG is a Hold and WRB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 22, 2025
Stock price -- (AFG: $135.14 vs. WRB: $59.19)
Brand notoriety: AFG and WRB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFG: 92% vs. WRB: 147%
Market capitalization -- AFG: $11.28B vs. WRB: $22.69B
AFG [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $11.28B. WRB’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $22.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWRB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WRB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFG is a better buy in the long-term than WRB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WRB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WRB is a better buy in the short-term than AFG.

Price Growth

AFG (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.85% price change this week, while WRB (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFG is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

WRB is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+2.11% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WRB($22.7B) has a higher market cap than AFG($11.3B). WRB has higher P/E ratio than AFG: WRB (17.32) vs AFG (13.41). WRB YTD gains are higher at: 1.145 vs. AFG (-0.702). WRB has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. AFG (1.75B). AFG has less debt than WRB: AFG (1.48B) vs WRB (2.84B). WRB has higher revenues than AFG: WRB (12.1B) vs AFG (7.73B).
AFGWRBAFG / WRB
Capitalization11.3B22.7B50%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.7021.145-61%
P/E Ratio13.4117.3277%
Revenue7.73B12.1B64%
Total Cash1.75B21.5B8%
Total Debt1.48B2.84B52%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFG vs WRB: Fundamental Ratings
AFG
WRB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
187
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1710
SMR RATING
1..100
8391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4746
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4965
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AFG's Valuation (52) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WRB (86). This means that AFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than WRB’s over the last 12 months.

WRB's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AFG (17). This means that WRB’s stock grew similarly to AFG’s over the last 12 months.

AFG's SMR Rating (83) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WRB (91). This means that AFG’s stock grew similarly to WRB’s over the last 12 months.

WRB's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AFG (47). This means that WRB’s stock grew similarly to AFG’s over the last 12 months.

AFG's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as WRB (65). This means that AFG’s stock grew similarly to WRB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFGWRB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLD253.133.86
+1.55%
SPDR® Gold Shares
LEMB36.460.43
+1.19%
iShares JP Morgan EM Local Ccy Bd ETF
FDRV13.950.12
+0.87%
Fidelity Elctrc Vhcls & Ftr Trnsptn ETF
TMFC60.980.40
+0.66%
Motley Fool 100 ETF
TAGG41.91N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price QM US Bond ETF

WRB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRB has been closely correlated with AXS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WRB jumps, then AXS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRB
1D Price
Change %
WRB100%
-0.52%
AXS - WRB
67%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
HIG - WRB
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
TRV - WRB
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
L - WRB
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
AFG - WRB
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
More