Ad is loading...
AFLG vs RECS
AFLG vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts AFLG vs RECS
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
Price$32.76
Change+$0.51 (+1.58%)
Volume$95.45K
Net Assets239.96M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$32.33
Change+$0.68 (+2.15%)
Volume$748.99K
Net Assets2.32B
AFLG vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFLG vs. RECS commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFLG is a StrongBuy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.32B vs. AFLG (240M). AFLG has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: AFLG (-4.930) vs RECS (-6.615). AFLG was incepted earlier than RECS: AFLG (5 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than AFLG (0.55). RECS (49.00) and AFLG (48.00) have matching turnover.
| AFLG | RECS | AFLG / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -4.930 | -6.615 | 75% |
| Net Assets | 240M | 2.32B | 10% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.15 | 367% |
| Turnover | 48.00 | 49.00 | 98% |
| Yield | 0.69 | 0.73 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AFLG | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 70% | 10 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AFLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFLG has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFLG jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFLG | 100% | +1.58% | ||
| MCO - AFLG | 77% Closely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| HLT - AFLG | 74% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| SPGI - AFLG | 72% Closely correlated | +2.35% | ||
| TT - AFLG | 71% Closely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| CRBG - AFLG | 71% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +2.15% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +3.29% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +6.16% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +3.45% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +5.22% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
More | ||||