Ad is loading...
AFLG vs RECS
AFLG vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts AFLG vs RECS
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
Price$35.34
Change+$0.20 (+0.57%)
Volume$222.99K
Net Assets132.49M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.91%)
Volume$746.56K
Net Assets1.71B
AFLG vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFLG vs. RECS commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFLG is a StrongBuy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.71B vs. AFLG (132M). AFLG has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: AFLG (2.346) vs RECS (2.137). AFLG was incepted earlier than RECS: AFLG (5 years) vs RECS (5 years). AFLG has a higher turnover RECS (45.00) vs RECS (45.00).
| AFLG | RECS | AFLG / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 2.346 | 2.137 | 110% |
| Net Assets | 132M | 1.71B | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 55.00 | 45.00 | 122% |
| Yield | 1.22 | 0.89 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AFLG | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 61% | 11 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 87% | 11 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 68% | 11 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 85% | 13 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 68% | 19 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 66% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AFLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFLG has been loosely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFLG jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFLG | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| VRT - AFLG | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
| TT - AFLG | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| CRBG - AFLG | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| HWM - AFLG | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| APP - AFLG | 49% Loosely correlated | +3.11% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.91% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
More | ||||