Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFLG vs RECS
AFLG vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts AFLG vs RECS
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
Price$34.91
Change+$0.14 (+0.40%)
Volume$200
Net Assets282.76M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$34.55
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Volume$2.23K
Net Assets2.69B
AFLG vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFLG vs. RECS commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFLG is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.69B vs. AFLG (283M). AFLG has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: AFLG (0.903) vs RECS (-0.231). AFLG was incepted earlier than RECS: AFLG (5 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than AFLG (0.55). RECS (49.00) and AFLG (48.00) have matching turnover.
| AFLG | RECS | AFLG / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 0.903 | -0.231 | -391% |
| Net Assets | 283M | 2.69B | 11% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.15 | 367% |
| Turnover | 48.00 | 49.00 | 98% |
| Yield | 0.70 | 0.73 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AFLG | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AFLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFLG has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFLG jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFLG | 100% | -1.64% | ||
| MCO - AFLG | 77% Closely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| HLT - AFLG | 76% Closely correlated | -2.62% | ||
| CRBG - AFLG | 74% Closely correlated | -3.68% | ||
| TT - AFLG | 72% Closely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| SPGI - AFLG | 71% Closely correlated | -2.42% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -1.62% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.68% | ||
More | ||||