Ad is loading...
AFLG vs RECS
AFLG vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts AFLG vs RECS
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
Price$35.47
Change-$0.61 (-1.69%)
Volume$25.42K
Net Assets196.84M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.36
Change-$0.62 (-1.72%)
Volume$330.07K
Net Assets1.89B
AFLG vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFLG vs. RECS commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFLG is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.89B vs. AFLG (197M). AFLG has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: AFLG (2.722) vs RECS (2.137). AFLG was incepted earlier than RECS: AFLG (5 years) vs RECS (5 years). AFLG has a higher turnover RECS (45.00) vs RECS (45.00).
| AFLG | RECS | AFLG / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 2.722 | 2.137 | 127% |
| Net Assets | 197M | 1.89B | 10% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 55.00 | 45.00 | 122% |
| Yield | 1.22 | 0.89 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AFLG | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AFLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFLG has been loosely correlated with TT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFLG jumps, then TT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFLG | 100% | -1.69% | ||
| TT - AFLG | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.22% | ||
| VRT - AFLG | 58% Loosely correlated | -8.43% | ||
| HWM - AFLG | 55% Loosely correlated | -6.22% | ||
| APP - AFLG | 50% Loosely correlated | -7.71% | ||
| CRBG - AFLG | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.36% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -1.72% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
More | ||||