AG
Price
$6.29
Change
+$0.27 (+4.49%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.79B
19 days until earnings call
MMNGF
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.05 (+35.71%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
44.02M
Ad is loading...

AG vs MMNGF

Header iconAG vs MMNGF Comparison
Open Charts AG vs MMNGFBanner chart's image
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER
Price$6.29
Change+$0.27 (+4.49%)
Volume$26.37M
Capitalization1.79B
Metallic Minerals
Price$0.20
Change+$0.05 (+35.71%)
Volume$97.11K
Capitalization44.02M
AG vs MMNGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AG vs. MMNGF commentary
Apr 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AG is a StrongBuy and MMNGF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 12, 2025
Stock price -- (AG: $6.29 vs. MMNGF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: AG: Notable vs. MMNGF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AG: 128% vs. MMNGF: 175%
Market capitalization -- AG: $1.79B vs. MMNGF: $44.02M
AG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.79B. MMNGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $44.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMNGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMNGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MMNGF is a better buy in the long-term than AG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AG’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMNGF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MMNGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMNGF is a better buy in the short-term than AG.

Price Growth

AG (@Precious Metals) experienced а +12.72% price change this week, while MMNGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +52.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +8.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

AG is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+8.62% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AG($1.79B) has a higher market cap than MMNGF($44M). MMNGF YTD gains are higher at: 99.386 vs. AG (14.694). MMNGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.19M vs. AG (-77.45M). AG has more cash in the bank: 202M vs. MMNGF (216K). MMNGF has less debt than AG: MMNGF (15K) vs AG (255M). AG has higher revenues than MMNGF: AG (587M) vs MMNGF (0).
AGMMNGFAG / MMNGF
Capitalization1.79B44M4,077%
EBITDA-77.45M-6.19M1,251%
Gain YTD14.69499.38615%
P/E Ratio87.72N/A-
Revenue587M0-
Total Cash202M216K93,519%
Total Debt255M15K1,700,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AG vs MMNGF: Fundamental Ratings
AG
MMNGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7517
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9182
SMR RATING
1..100
9095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AG's Valuation (76) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MMNGF (96) in the null industry. This means that AG’s stock grew similarly to MMNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MMNGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as AG (91) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MMNGF’s stock grew similarly to AG’s over the last 12 months.

AG's SMR Rating (90) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MMNGF (95) in the null industry. This means that AG’s stock grew similarly to MMNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MMNGF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as AG (56) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MMNGF’s stock grew similarly to AG’s over the last 12 months.

AG's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MMNGF (100) in the null industry. This means that AG’s stock grew similarly to MMNGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGMMNGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICCC5.410.34
+6.81%
ImmuCell Corp
HBB17.480.38
+2.22%
Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company
CME261.543.15
+1.22%
CME Group
HLIO27.100.17
+0.63%
Helios Technologies
FYBR35.88-0.06
-0.17%
Frontier Communications Parent

AG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AG has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AG jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AG
1D Price
Change %
AG100%
+4.49%
PAAS - AG
83%
Closely correlated
+4.19%
MAG - AG
82%
Closely correlated
+5.93%
HL - AG
80%
Closely correlated
+5.67%
CDE - AG
79%
Closely correlated
+7.83%
EXK - AG
78%
Closely correlated
+5.63%
More

MMNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMNGF has been loosely correlated with EXK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMNGF jumps, then EXK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMNGF
1D Price
Change %
MMNGF100%
+36.27%
EXK - MMNGF
38%
Loosely correlated
+5.63%
AG - MMNGF
35%
Loosely correlated
+4.49%
FSM - MMNGF
35%
Loosely correlated
+4.01%
PAAS - MMNGF
34%
Loosely correlated
+4.19%
MAG - MMNGF
34%
Loosely correlated
+5.93%
More