AG vs PAAS
Pan American Silver (PAAS) and First Majestic Silver (AG) are companies based in Canada which mine silver and other metals in Latin America. PAAS has approximately 12 mines in Mexico, Peru, Bolivia, Argentina, and Canada, while AG has approximately 7 mines in Mexico. The mimes of both companies produce silver, zinc and lead primarily, as well as gold and copper. PAAS is the larger of the two, with a market cap of about $5B, while AG’s market cap is about $3B. Their price-to-book ratios are almost the same (around 2.0) but AG’s price-to-sales is more inflated. PAAS’s diluted EPS is also better at 1.42 while AG’s is only 0.26 currently. PAAS seems to be delivering better margins and more than a token dividend. Both companies have occasionally been the subject of negative news coverage as they incur the ire of activists and locals, but this is common for international companies which seek to tap into the natural resources of foreign countries.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PAAS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
AG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.94% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.
Reported Earning Dates
AG is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
PAAS is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| AG | PAAS | AG / PAAS | |
| Capitalization | 1.79B | 5.59B | 32% |
| EBITDA | -77.45M | 296M | -26% |
| Gain YTD | 3.396 | 33.472 | 10% |
| P/E Ratio | 87.72 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 587M | 2.02B | 29% |
| Total Cash | 202M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 255M | N/A | - |
AG | PAAS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAAS's Valuation (12) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for AG (81). This means that PAAS’s stock grew significantly faster than AG’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AG (100). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to AG’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's SMR Rating (87) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AG (89). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to AG’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AG (53). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to AG’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AG (94). This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AG’s over the last 12 months.
| AG | PAAS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | about 1 month ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 78% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ANGL | 28.93 | N/A | N/A |
| VanEck Fallen Angel HiYld Bd ETF | |||
| BOAT | 32.36 | -0.02 | -0.07% |
| SonicShares™ Global Shipping ETF | |||
| FTQI | 20.67 | -0.27 | -1.29% |
| First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | |||
| BNO | 28.31 | -0.55 | -1.91% |
| United States Brent Oil | |||
| RFEU | 61.58 | -1.44 | -2.28% |
| First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Eurp ETF | |||
AG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AG has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AG jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.
PAAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAAS | 100% | -2.15% | ||
| MAG - PAAS | 86% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| HL - PAAS | 85% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| AEM - PAAS | 82% Closely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| AG - PAAS | 80% Closely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| FSM - PAAS | 79% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||