AG
Price
$8.57
Change
-$0.10 (-1.15%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.79B
19 days until earnings call
PGLDF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AG vs PGLDF

Header iconAG vs PGLDF Comparison
Open Charts AG vs PGLDFBanner chart's image
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER
Price$8.57
Change-$0.10 (-1.15%)
Volume$15.17M
Capitalization1.79B
P2 Gold
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30.5K
Capitalization16M
AG vs PGLDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AG vs. PGLDF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AG is a StrongBuy and PGLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AG: $8.57 vs. PGLDF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: AG: Notable vs. PGLDF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AG: 61% vs. PGLDF: 51%
Market capitalization -- AG: $1.79B vs. PGLDF: $16M
AG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.79B. PGLDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePGLDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PGLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PGLDF is a better buy in the long-term than AG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGLDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PGLDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PGLDF is a better buy in the short-term than AG.

Price Growth

AG (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.50% price change this week, while PGLDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

AG is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

PGLDF is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.16% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AG($1.79B) has a higher market cap than PGLDF($16M). PGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 136.145 vs. AG (56.393). PGLDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -12.93M vs. AG (-77.45M). AG has more cash in the bank: 202M vs. PGLDF (378K). PGLDF has less debt than AG: PGLDF (101K) vs AG (255M). AG has higher revenues than PGLDF: AG (587M) vs PGLDF (0).
AGPGLDFAG / PGLDF
Capitalization1.79B16M11,213%
EBITDA-77.45M-12.93M599%
Gain YTD56.393136.14541%
P/E Ratio87.72N/A-
Revenue587M0-
Total Cash202M378K53,439%
Total Debt255M101K252,475%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AG vs PGLDF: Fundamental Ratings
AG
PGLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6877
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
90100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3937
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
932
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PGLDF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as AG (81) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PGLDF’s stock grew similarly to AG’s over the last 12 months.

PGLDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PGLDF’s stock grew similarly to AG’s over the last 12 months.

AG's SMR Rating (90) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PGLDF (100) in the null industry. This means that AG’s stock grew similarly to PGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

PGLDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as AG (39) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PGLDF’s stock grew similarly to AG’s over the last 12 months.

PGLDF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AG (93) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PGLDF’s stock grew significantly faster than AG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGPGLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMFAX91.15N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Materials A
CLREX54.96N/A
N/A
Columbia Balanced Inst2
LEQCX11.77N/A
N/A
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
CRIHX12.06N/A
N/A
CRM Long/Short Opportunities Instl
TFIFX47.45N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Financial Services I

PGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGLDF and FFMGF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGLDF and FFMGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGLDF
1D Price
Change %
PGLDF100%
-4.95%
FFMGF - PGLDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
AG - PGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
HYMC - PGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
ZCTSF - PGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.93%
EXK - PGLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
More