Ad is loading...
AGAWX vs NLSCX
AGAWX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts AGAWX vs NLSCX
Allspring Global Long/Short Equity R6
Price$11.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.36M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.45
Change+$0.11 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.1B
AGAWX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGAWX vs. NLSCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGAWX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.1B vs. AGAWX (49.4M). AGAWX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: AGAWX (2.84) vs NLSCX (0.00). AGAWX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: AGAWX (10 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). AGAWX (2.76) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). AGAWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 285.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). AGAWX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSCX: AGAWX (0) vs NLSCX (1000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.36 vs. AGAWX (-9.13). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 24.28 vs. AGAWX (14.92).
| AGAWX | NLSCX | AGAWX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 2.43 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.76 | 2.43 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.175 | -1.979 | 413% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.4M | 7.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.13 | 2.36 | -386% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.01 | 5.10 | -79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.92 | 24.28 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.39 | 26.03 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers