Ad is loading...
AGAZX vs NLSCX
AGAZX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts AGAZX vs NLSCX
Allspring Global Long/Short Equity Inst
Price$10.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.52M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.44
Change-$0.23 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.25B
AGAZX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGAZX vs. NLSCX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGAZX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.25B vs. AGAZX (53.5M). AGAZX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: AGAZX (2.73) vs NLSCX (0.00). AGAZX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: AGAZX (10 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). AGAZX (2.86) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). AGAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 285.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGAZX: NLSCX (1000) vs AGAZX (1000000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. AGAZX (-9.99). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.76 vs. AGAZX (19.97).
| AGAZX | NLSCX | AGAZX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 2.43 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.86 | 2.43 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.222 | -0.113 | 7,272% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.5M | 7.25B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.99 | 4.25 | -235% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.10 | 5.37 | -58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.97 | 30.76 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.57 | 29.14 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers