Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCSX vs RSLAX
AGCSX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts AGCSX vs RSLAX
AGCSX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCSX vs. RSLAX commentary
Jun 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCSX is a Buy and RSLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. AGCSX (65M). AGCSX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: AGCSX (0.81) vs RSLAX (0.21). AGCSX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: AGCSX (10 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than AGCSX (0.91). AGCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. RSLAX (41.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCSX: RSLAX (250) vs AGCSX (5000000). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.36 vs. AGCSX (14.90). AGCSX return over 5 years is better than : -2.62 vs. RSLAX (-8.98).
| AGCSX | RSLAX | AGCSX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.74 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.74 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.898 | 14.732 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.21 | 393% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.90 | 16.36 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.31 | 35.31 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.62 | -8.98 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.75 | 82.03 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement